[ad_1]
Nolan Bauerle is a research director at CoinDesk.
For more data and information, visit the CoinDesk Crypto-Economics Explorer.
Starting today, CoinDesk will use GitHub to help outsource the methodology changes and data sources of our Crypto-Economics Explorer (CEX) tool, our comprehensive data tool designed to measure and compare cryptographic badets.
After launching the beta version of our tool in November, the most critical criticism we heard was about our methodology of calculating developer interest in a blockchain. Specifically, we heard comments on the decision to count only the activity of a GitHub code repository in the "developer score" of each blockchain.
The criticism was that the methodology behind the CEX was insufficient to measure the interest of the developers for each project.
For example, the bitcoin reference implementation is Bitcoin Core (which is the repository followed by CEX). Although it works well for Bitcoin, Ethereum is implemented via multiple clients, which include the largest repository (Geth, which we follow), but also the Parity client developed independently, interoperable, but equally important (whose repository is not not currently followed in the CEX). ), as well as customers such as cpp-ethereum and others.
Criticizing Bitcoin's only customer, the critics said the CEX was painting a more accurate picture of developers' interest in Bitcoin, but that with only one customer for Ethereum, the explorer had missed some of the developers interest for this blockchain.
Our logic of the conservative approach was to want to launch the beta version of our tool with the lowest common denominator: the interest of developers for the core protocols implemented in their main client. The comparison of highly heterogeneous block chains is a challenge and we wanted to have a solid foundation before further developing the data points and methodology.
From there, the plan was, and remains, to expand the list of code repositories we follow. Our ambition is to soon follow the activity of GitHub beyond the main protocol and client implementations, up to the badociated projects based on this blockchain, including portfolios, dapps and layer two solutions such as state channels and sidechains.
After launching and hearing the reviews, we decided to implement our global vision and expand the repository and activity on GitHub that we followed. However, when we started, we quickly realized the complexity of this task. What we wanted to do meant to follow thousands of projects and standards. We needed a solution that could adapt to the complexity and size of the industry and capture the interest and activity of developers in a blockchain "from head to toe".
Our solution now is to directly contact developer communities, allowing coders using different block strings to give feedback on our methodology in a framework that is perfectly suited to their work.
That is, Coindesk Data has published the methodology and data sources for the CEX developers to be interested in GitHub himself.
Our new repository contains several master files to launch the effort: one for the pensions we are currently monitoring, another for the weights we give to each data point and finally another for the integration methodology of the data. badociated projects in the future.
The goal is to use GitHub's workflow tools to help us evolve this important metric. Now everyone can ask CoinDesk Data to follow a repository, change the weights badigned to a given data point, or inform about any larger methodology changes.
We hope that this forum will help us to strengthen the methodology, stimulate debate and extend our coverage to all parts of GitHub related to our industry. We look forward to your comments.
Image via CoinDesk CEX
[ad_2]
Source link
