[ad_1]
Date of publication: Thursday 7 February 2019 8h19
He suddenly becomes very tight at the top. Well, I say up. Not at the top, a subject that has been widely treated elsewhere on these pages, but the lowest bit of the top, this bit between the fourth and the sixth.
Only a few weeks ago we would have talked about the difference between third and fifth place, but we are there. Three consecutive victories in the league have propelled the Spurs into a strange hinterland: the contenders for the title that many forget are in the running.
In the meantime, you would not know it because it's not a club that needs too much attention, but Manchester United have been really good – I think I heard someone say that he has a new manager, a new kitman or something – and that, as a result, they have almost caught up with Chelsea, fourth, and have even outstripped Arsenal.
In other words, as he was considering two Champions League spots available between three teams (Spurs, Chelsea and Arsenal) at the end of the year, there now seems to be room for three more Arsenal and United).
The wealth brought by this qualification has effectively transformed the highest level of the Premier League into a social balloon of the early nineteenth century. moaning, he brings unique pressure to these three managers, now known as "Elizabeth Bennetts".
Even during their impressive unbeaten start to the season, Maurizio Sarri has always insisted that Chelsea was more of a long-term project than its initial appearance, an badessment that everyone can now take part in. Unai Emery is sandwiched between a heavy business structure and an underperforming team. The impact of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer has been surprising enough that he runs the risk – at least in the short term – of becoming a victim of his own success. like Jurgen Klopp and Mauricio Pochettino, his competence having perhaps raised expectations far beyond a level he is able to achieve.
If we fail, we may not feel much sympathy for one of them, Elizabeth Bennetts, but it is inevitable that two of them will do so. -term fix, rather than the other two necessarily doing something wrong or taking their respective club in the wrong direction.
Any rational debate on the race for the current title (as if it could exist given the current stamp of the discussion in all areas, including that of our field), would accept that Liverpool and Manchester City were two exceptionally good sides, Tottenham . were incredibly brilliant and regardless of who won the title, the race was well done (at least so far). It's just part of the game that not everyone has to win.
Given that the three Elizabeth Bennetts in the challenge for fourth place have all joined their clubs at real moments of transition, would not it be wise to apply the same principle to them?
That's not to say that they will not make mistakes that deserve to be criticized, but the fans and experts most susceptible to the fits of apoplexy and reflex hyperbole will be well (I am advised, the one who gives the advice) to consider that even if the three Lizzies were to do their job perfectly by the end of the season, two of them would still not succeed in trapping their M Darcy.
Steven Poulet is on Twitter and already regrets this metaphor of Pride & Prejudice extended, so needless to mention it, yes?
[ad_2]
Source link