Secrets of Meghan's letter to Thomas Markle, experts say

Writing experts have badyzed a letter sent shortly after her marriage by the Duchess of Susbad to her ex-father to reveal the information that this gives to his character.

In this five-page letter sent last August, Meghan accused Thomas Markle of having broken his heart "in a million pieces" by giving interviews to the press, making stories and attacking his new husband.

Today, Emma Bache, a major UK writing expert, said the "highly stylized" letter suggested that Meghan was "ultra cautious" but also "showman and narcissist".

She told MailOnline: "Meghan shows a very stylized and slow writing. She is very cautious, knows that the world has it in her eyes and that's how she likes it.

"This is not a spontaneous or intellectually creative woman, but a consummate performer and strategist.

"There is a strong inclination to the right and his letters have often been traced. The emotion and energy are enormous, but she is self-aware and self-oriented.

& # 39; However, she suffers from anxiety and, in this case, her habitual regularity and her control of the pen strokes show hesitations and a slight basic difference – she manifests some hesitation to master herself. But not much! & # 39;

Bache continued to badyze other stylistic features of the letter that could take a look at Meghan's mind.

"The pen is strong – it is motivated physically and sensually as well as materially," she said.

"It seems to be attacking at the upper left area a little incongruous and visually dominant – it's the female equivalent of the Dandy in the 21st century, the fop or even the showman – and yes the narcissistic.

"There are circles in the little letters that indicate his secret and his refusal to reveal his true inner thoughts.

"She is stubborn and unwilling to give up her thoughts, but she is ambitious, works very hard and is motivated."

Tracey Trussell, a graphology consultant at Handright, also presented an badysis of the letter.

She warned that not being able to manipulate the original pages made it difficult to accurately badess the pressure of the handwriting – a key indicator of the writer's feelings – but added that He still contained several ideas.

She told MailOnline: "Meghan's writing is very stylized, thus revealing her perfectionist side and her desire to hide her true feelings.

& # 39; However, there are other clues. All the written text has a mechanical regularity and the rhythm is rhythmic and artificial, which shows how much self-discipline that Meghan exercises with herself to control her emotions and actions does not prevent her from doing the bad thing.

"There are also many starting and starting traits at the beginning of the words – on the vertical axis (visible in the thickness of the letters) – which also tells us how much she had thought about writing this letter and how she was trying to say the right thing and be the strong person.

"These almost invisible attributes reveal how much something that has happened in the past has been a source of disappointment to her."

The handwriting can also give an impression of the character of the author, said Trussell.

& # 39; Its emotional barometer (visible in handwriting) is set right, which means that emotional responsiveness is high – Meghan wants to be friendly and cooperative, she wants to communicate and express herself.

"In addition, the spacing of the words is very wide and irregular, which also tells us that she thought a lot and took into account the content of what she said, in to the extent that it naturally caused him to feel a little bit of anxiety. . This case clearly affects Meghan deeply.

& # 39; She has strong leftist tendencies (where her strokes succeed) that reveal how much she thinks about things that happened to her in the past and how much she can not forget about people who counted so much for her her life. "

Trussell also pointed to Meghan's writing embellishments, including traits that sweep the top of the words.

She said, "They look like small protective umbrellas, which gives more credence to his deep feelings about it.

& # 39; They also reveal his vulnerability – the flaw in his armor. Surely enough evidence that Meghan cares what? It must be exhausting for her!

In the letter, Meghan reproaches his father, anxiously, for standing side by side with his half-sister Samantha – who attacked her in the press – while "suffering in silence from her cruel lies" .

She then complains that Mr. Markle did not attempt to contact her – and reprimand him for falsely telling reporters that he was the one who had been fled – a criticism that his father was vehemently refuting. .

She also accuses her father of having snubbed her and Prince Harry offers to help him when he has withdrawn from their marriage following two heart attacks and accuses him of being ungrateful for the money. that she gave him.

The former award-winning lighting director of Hollywood, who now lives in Mexico, said he had never intended to make the handwritten missive public. "out of respect for Meghan" – but that he was forced into it now, because its content had been falsely portrayed.

Contrary to the badertions of the Duchess's friends, he said the letter was not trying to remedy the situation. "I thought it would be an olive branch. On the contrary, it was a dagger in the heart, "said Mr. Markle, 74, last night.

He dismissed suggestions that he had made no attempt at tinkering since his marriage. He showed this newspaper texts that, he says, prove that he has reached out several times to his daughter and son-in-law that he has never met.

The American magazine People claimed to "put things in order" about the Duchess's relationship with her father and the critics of her style as a royal.

He relied on interviews with five friends, including at least one of the Duchess's co-stars in Suits, the legal drama in which she played for six years.

The Duchess was targeted by her apparent decision to allow her confidants to defend her during the extraordinary interview, without it being understood that Kensington Palace would have been involved.

The palace refused to specify whether the anonymous sources of the magazine had cooperated at the direct request of the Duchess or with its tacit approval.

Former Buckingham Palace Press Secretary Dickie Arbiter, who worked for both Prince Charles and the late Princess Diana of Wales, feared that this decision would only make things worse.

"Assuming – and since these sources are anonymous, we do not know for sure – that this was done with his agreement, it opened a Pandora's box, the problem with his father is an open wound and I'm not absolutely sure that's the best idea to make that worse. "

Last night, Markle said it was unfair for his daughter's friends to use the media to "silence a reply" when he was criticized for "giving a handful" of press interviews. In last Wednesday's article, the Duchess's friends said she was upset by his response to the letter, in which he proposed to his father and daughter to pose for press photos.

A friend said, "She feels" it's the opposite of what I'm saying. I tell you that I do not want to communicate through the media, and you ask me to … Have you heard anything from what I said? "

Mr. Markle said that he had suggested the photo opportunity as a way of showing the world that they could become friends again, describing the reading that the Duchess interpreted as a "tragic misunderstanding" that he would like to be able to resolve. . The break between the duchess and her father began after The Mail on Sunday revealed, a few days before her wedding last May, that he had collaborated with the paparazzi to organize a series of lucrative photographic opportunities. .

Such was his humiliation that he proposed to withdraw from the royal wedding and was subsequently prevented from going after having suffered two heart attacks.

Since then, he has given a series of prejudicial interviews during which he expressed his dismay at the fact that his daughter and the royal family have given up.

The first book of Emma Bache, Reading Between The Lines, is published by Quercus on August 30, 2018.

Thomas's anguished response