[ad_1]
Afri Schoedon, a longtime contributor to Ethereum, has suddenly stopped working on the second largest cryptocurrency. A few days ago, Schoedon tweeted a message saying, "Polkadot delivers what Serenity should be. Change the idea. The meme sparked on Reddit and the situation evolved until the developer left early this morning.
I did not leave social media, I left Ethereum. I did not go in the dark, I just left the community. I am no longer coordinating ranges, building test networks, or contributing differently. I did not work on Polkadot, I never did it, I worked on Ethereum. I did not hate Ethereum, I loved it.
– Afri (@ 5chdn) February 19, 2019
'Change My Mind'
NCC recovered the main catalyst for this incident. Here is the same original that triggered two communities on Reddit:
The original tweet of Afri Schoedon, retrieved via Google Webcache.
The tweet was first shared on the EthTrader subreddit, then transferred to the main Ethereum subreddit, where Schoedon is moderator. Importantly, this last message has not been removed. Schoedon participated and he has repeatedly linked users to excuses:
A tweet that Schoedon has repeatedly linked to Reddit.
This tweet has also been deleted since.
Now, for the Ethereum underdogs, the original tweet may seem a bit tame. He apparently says that the Polkadot blockchain project is a superior solution to the various elements that make up Ethereum 2.0, right? Well, sort of.
The Ethereum community is wary of badogs of block current
According to several users of the Ethereum subdirectory, the tweet is only evidence that Schoedon intentionally sabotages the development of Ethereum in favor of third-party scaling solutions such as Polkadot. A user writes:
"We have been told for a long time that Polkadot is not a competitor of Ethereum. Now Afri confirms that is the case. D & # 39; agreement. So with this information, how can he consciously continue to work on both?
However, Schoedon has never contributed to the development of Polkadot. His profile GitHub shows it well. Most of his work on Ethereum was done on Parity, an Ethereum customer. The confusion arises because Polkadot is a product of the same company. Schoedon was a paid contributor to Parity. It is logical that in the course of his work he developed an affinity for Polkadot, but as he says in his messages on the subject, he was just trying to create a debate.
Ethereum community launches revelation for alleged pro-polkadot sentiment
Nevertheless, the shock in return was severe. Ethereum users are afraid of being "stuck", as this user says:
"Why the [Ethereum Foundation] give $ 5 million to parity when they have a clear incentive to hinder progress with Ethereum? It feels not only in a different team, but trying to blatantly block us. Is it a shakedown to get more money, or more support to unlock their multisig funds? If so, I think they would be better served by writing an open letter to the ETH community explaining their position and asking for feedback on how to better collaborate without this pbadive aggression. "
"Do not block our flow, my brother"
The statement probably requires clarification. In essence, this refers to the belief that Blockstream, a Bitcoins company dedicated to second-layer solutions like Liquid Network, has deliberately prevented scaling Bitcoin to boost the need for their products. The cryptographic community is deeply ingrained, leading so far to create Bitcoin Cash and then Bitcoin SV.
Apparently, the opinion that Afri Schoedon and Parity generally wish to block the development of the Ethereum main network in favor of Polkadot is quite widespread. In reviewing the Reddit discussions, it seems almost an accepted fact. This user says:
"The tweets were just the drop that made the camels fall. It's been almost a year now that he's trengue in the development of Ethereum (sic) by always seeking to postpone each upgrade and by consciously introducing unproductive discussion points into development discussions. "
Here's a video of the Ethereum community talking about Schoedon in the recent past:
Afri Schoedon leaves Ethereum development
Thus, in response to what might be perceived as an overreaction on the part of dozens of people, Schoedon decided to leave his work on Ethereum. He is also looking to work in other areas of technology now. "No Token Projects" necessarily exclude any project funded by ICO.
If you have an exciting project that really matters and does not come with a token, send me an email. I am working on projects of radical decentralization and improvement of privacy, data, security and empowerment. I have a lot of free time now.
– Afri (@ 5chdn) February 19, 2019
Not everyone was happy to see him leave. His followers on Twitter had a decidedly different reaction:
It's really a sad day for the entire Ethereum community – we just lost one of our most dedicated members for dumb reasons. @ 5chdnI understand your reaction but sincerely hope that you will reconsider your decision. I hope we can all think and grow from the events of the last days. https://t.co/8PQJBxRpGA
– Simon Polrot (@simonpolrot) February 19, 2019
I can not help but think that it is more a failure of governance on the part of the ethnic community than a successful job by a group of very minority lynchies (potentially co-ordinated 'outside). @ 5chdn as we can …
– Andrej Muzevic (@andrej_muzevic) February 19, 2019
It's a total stupidity. @ 5chdn is one of the best contributors of the Ethereum community. I know it's hard after all this bullshit, but at IMO, you have to continue your good works by ignoring all the shit of social media. A dev knows the value of another DEV
– Satyam Agrawal (@satyamagl) February 19, 2019
There was one exception, of course:
Goodbye and good riddance!
– Merkle tree (@merkle_tree) February 19, 2019
The episode, which was fast and whose resolution seemed disappointing, is reminiscent of the tumultuous exit of former Bitcoin developer Mike Hearn. Hearn, a big block supporter, has been harshly criticized for many of his opinions. At the time, many members of the community saw him as a "business type" with aspirations for banks. He would have sold all his bitcoin and worked for R3.
Featured image of Shutterstock
[ad_2]
Source link
