[ad_1]
A year after the scandal began, Facebook is facing new and explosive questions about when senior executives were informed of the misuse of Cambridge Analytica user data. Federal prosecutors are investigating allegations that the social media giant has concealed the extent of its media relations. strengthen.
the Observer also learned that a Facebook board member and confidant of his CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, had met Christopher Wylie, the whistleblower of Cambridge Analytica, in the summer of 2016, just when the company's processing company data was starting to work for the Trump campaign.
Facebook has repeatedly refused to say when its leaders, including Zuckerberg, had learned that Cambridge Analytica had used data collected from millions of people around the world to target them with political messages without their consent. But Silicon Valley insiders said to the Observer Marc Andreessen, a board member of Facebook, founder of venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and one of Silicon Valley's most influential personalities, attended a meeting with Wylie held in Andreessen Horowitz offices two years before posing as a whistleblower.
It's the end of one of the worst weeks in Facebook's history. The shocking announcement on Friday that an armed man who killed 49 people praying in New Zealand watched the mbadacre on Facebook was crowned with news. In the hours that followed, Facebook and Google failed to prevent the videos from becoming viral, while hundreds of thousands of people watched the video.
But the ObserverThe revelations on Facebook open a new angle to the scandal that lasted a whole year, raising questions that go up to the board of directors.
Those attending the meeting with Wylie and Andreessen said that it was created to learn what Cambridge Analytica was doing with Facebook data and how technologists could work to "fix it". Andreesen Horowitz did not fully explain in what capacity and who attended the meeting, but it is nevertheless an extremely embarrbading revelation for Facebook, which was revealed last week as being the subject of a criminal investigation. Cambridge Analytica.
Key Events in the row on the political data badysis firm
December 2015
The Guardian reports that political badyst Cambridge Analytica was participating in Ted Cruz's presidential campaign, suggesting that the Republican candidate was using psychological data based on research done on tens of millions of Facebook users to attempt to stand out from his political rivals.
June 2016
Cambridge Analytica, the political advisory firm whose vice president is Steve Bannon, is starting to work with the help of the Trump Brad Parscale campaign in San Antonio, alongside Facebook and Google employees. Two months later, Donald Trump returns Paul Manafort to the leadership of his campaign and appoints Bannon. Campaign Spends $ 6 Million on Cambridge Analytica Services
March 17, 2018
Christopher Wylie, co-founder of Cambridge Analytica, says in The Observer and The New York Times that the company has used 50 million Facebook profiles harvested in connection with a major data scandal. This number was then revised by Facebook to 87 million. Wylie said the data that was sold to Cambridge Analytica was then used to develop "psychographic" profiles of people and provide them with pro-Trump online materials.
March 21, 2018
After four days of refusal to comment, Mark Zuckerberg publishes an article on Facebook apologizing for the data breach. The Facebook CEO reacts to the data scandal saying, "We have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can not, we do not deserve to serve you, I have tried hard to understand. has pbaded and how to make it happen again "
March 25, 2018
Zuckerberg publishes one-page ads in several British and American newspapers to apologize for a "breach of trust"
April 25, 2018
Facebook publishes its first earnings report since the publication of the scandal. The quarterly business figure is the highest in the first quarter and the second highest in general
May 2018
Wylie appears before the US Congress to answer questions about the scandal.
Cambridge Analytica launches into the administration. A few days later, it is reported that the FBI and the US Department of Justice are investigating the company
July 2018
The Office of the Information Commissioner of the United Kingdom has announced its intention to give Facebook a £ 500,000 fine for the data scandal, saying Facebook "is breaking the law by not protecting information of people ".
119 billion dollars were removed from the stock market value of Facebook when Zuckerberg announced that a significant number of users were leaving the platform
November 2018
Having refused multiple invitations to appear before the British parliamentary inquiry over false information, Mark Zuckerberg is "chaired empty" at a meeting of a special commission composed of members of nine national parliaments.
March 2019
It is reported that the US Department of Justice is conducting a criminal investigation into data sharing between Facebook and other technology companies.
Federal prosecutors in the Northern District of California are investigating Facebook's claims that it was unaware of Analytica's abuse of Cambridge data. guardian journalist, the New York Times reported on Friday. "We cooperate with the investigators and take these probes seriously," said a Facebook spokesman New York Times.
Andreessen is one of the most influential personalities in Silicon Valley and was one of the first investors on Facebook. During the 2016 period in which Facebook said to investigate the misuse of data by Cambridge Analytica, Christopher Wylie was invited to a meeting of Andreessen Horowitz's firm.
Wylie, the young Canadian scientist specializing in data, would then expose the scandal of Observer one year ago. He then revealed how Cambridge Analytica had collaborated with a University of Cambridge scholar, Aleksandr Kogan, to collect Facebook data from users, without their consent, in order to model their personalities and target them politically.
A Silicon Valley technician familiar with the meeting at Andreessen Horowitz said: "Some people were very concerned about the information Cambridge Analytica provided on the data, and the meeting was organized to try to better understand as possible in order to find solutions possible. That's why Wylie was invited. They wanted his knowledge. He was asked a lot of questions, especially about the company's contacts with Russian entities. "
It is understood that a Facebook group was formed, of which Wylie was a member, and Andreessen would have kept in touch with Wylie until the end of the month. Observer broke the story of his involvement in March of last year.
A Valley insider who attended the meeting said, "What's strange is that there was no follow-up. The idea was to reverse the problem to find solutions. But we have never heard of a follow-up with Facebook's security team or any attempt to implement this information. "
Andreessen Horowitz refused to answer questions ObserverQuestions from. Facebook has repeatedly refused to tell members of Congress and the British parliamentary inquiry committee about false information when senior officials have learned about data abuse. He also refused to answer the ObserverQuestions from.
A spokesman said: "Facebook was not aware of the Kogan / GSR data transfer [Kogan’s business Global Science Research] Cambridge Analytica until December 2015. When Facebook learned that Kogan had broken Facebook's data usage rules, we acted. "
In another twist, Kogan told the New York Times On Friday, he intends to sue Facebook for defamation for allegedly misleading the company over how he intended to use the data. A Facebook spokesman called the trial "frivolous".
Damian Collins, president of the false parliamentary inquiry, said: "Facebook has refused to say which leaders knew what, when. They never explained whether the data had been destroyed or where it was sent.
"Last year, at the end of the story, the group announced the opening of an internal investigation into what other developers had access to data, including companies like Palantir. And he never reported. It's hard not to wonder why he's so evasive. "
David Carroll, an American professor who sued Cambridge Analytica in court for not telling him the personal data he had, said that it was essential to know who knew what when. "Why is Facebook scrambling?" He said. "We know that Facebook actually employed Joseph Chancellor, Kogan's business partner before guardian first report. It defies to believe that nobody knew anything. Zuckerberg's responses to Congress under oath are incredulous. It's amazing that a year later and we still do not know these basic facts. "
The ongoing battle between Carroll and Cambridge Analytica is reaching a critical point tomorrow. He is in the high court against the directors of Cambridge Analytica to oppose the dissolution of the companies. Carroll is concerned about the extent to which the directors have concealed the true nature of their relationship with Emerdata, the successor of the company, and the true purpose of the company's liquidation attempt. "They did everything to avoid giving me my data. It's the same as Facebook. They seem desperate for the truth not to be revealed. The directors contest the claims and continue their attempts to liquidate and resist Professor Carroll.
Ravi Naik, Carroll's attorney, who won the Best Human Rights Lawyer of the Year award for his work, said it was an important moment in his battle to uncover the truth about human rights. data held by Cambridge Analytica.
"Facebook has tried to avoid telling the truth through these evasive responses to lawmakers. And Cambridge Analytica have tried to do it through insolvency. We know that this completely toxic swamp of data has been used to target people in a political way, but we still do not know where these data came from or how they were used. We are always completely in the dark. This is an attempt to open this safe.
Source link
