Steve Jobs would like the iPad today? – Quartz

There are two truths with which Apple fans have to struggle this week.

The first is that Steve Jobs hated the styluses shamelessly. In 2007, during the introduction of the first iPhone, the founder of Apple said: "Who wants a stylus? You have to get them, put them away, you lose them. Yuck! Nobody wants a stylus. So do not use a stylus.

Second truth: all modern iPads, including new releases released on March 18, almost ten years after the original, now work with the Apple pencil, which some call a stylus.

Is the apple pencil a stylus?

The first question we must answer is whether Apple is going against the CEO who has allowed him to become the most valuable public company in the world. is a stylus.

At the time of the Jobs stylus speech, the cheapest and most popular touch screen type was the resistive touch screen. For this type of technology, you had to push two layers of screen together, which would create a circuit allowing the device to determine the location of your finger on the screen. If you've ever been bothered by a touch screen device, it was probably resistant.

The stylets were very prevalent at the time because of a simple physical formula. The smaller the surface of an object, the greater the pressure it can exert on another surface is important. The sharp tips of the first styli, such as the one presented by Jobs during its presentation in 2007, were needed to overcome the inefficiencies of touch screen technology.

Since the iPhone used a better type of touch screen called capacitive touch screen, which did not react to the force exerted on the screen but to the inherent electrical charge of your finger, no stylus n & rsquo; Was necessary.

So why the apple pencil? Released in 2015, the pencil is not necessary to overcome a deficiency of iPad screens, but to give greater fidelity to the 10 stilettos that God has given us, according to the Gospel of Jobs.

In other words, the main function of Apple Pencil is to increase the number of users, adding pressure sensitivity levels and changing the input method to a more familiar method for traditional artists who could draw or paint with physical tools. For the remaining 90% of users who are not artists, the Apple Pencil is large enough to mimic a real writing tool, rather than the traditional stylus that fits in the body of the device.

(Stylist enthusiasts might argue that the cutting edge of the traditional stylus also gave the user greater fidelity, since it was a more accurate tool for clicking on it. My argument is that the precision allowed by previous styli was only necessary for everyday tasks, because the screen sizes in 2007 were much smaller than they are today, especially on iPad).

So, Jobs would hate the pencil Apple?

Careful inspection of the source material reveals that Jobs's opposition to the stylus is not hardware-based, but logistics. "You have to get them, put them away, you lose them," he said. "Yuck!" He added.

This is indeed still a problem. In this regard, the original Apple pencil is worse than the historical styli in this regard because it was too big to fit in the body of the iPad. He did not attach himself to the iPad in any way, which means you had to either buy a case containing the iPad and pencil, or put the pencil in your pocket or your backpack and hope you have not accidentally pbaded it in the washer. .

The new version of the Apple Pencil, called Apple Pencil, is only available for the latest iPad Pro (the other iPad models only work with the non-new Apple Pencil, also called Apple Pencil ). The new pencil corrects somewhat the logistical problem: a magnet glue on the side of the iPad, while loading the pencil. The previous pencil had to be plugged into the Lightning port at the bottom of the iPad, which Jobs would have certainly hated because it was objectively ridiculous and was giving people ammunition to make fun of Apple.

What about the iPad itself?

If there is one thing Jobs does not hate, it's the iPad. The device was only thinner and lighter, while retaining roughly the same form factor as the original iPad introduced in 2010. The iPad Pro has even eliminated the majority of glbades, or the outer bar of non-screen bits, as well as home button. We all know that removing buttons and ports was very expensive at Jobs.

What is the verdict?

This deeply personal badysis of Quartz reveals that Steve Jobs would probably not hate the new iPad, but still hated the idea of ​​the pencil Apple. Although it has recently been touted as a creative device, the iPad has been touted by Jobs as being ideal for content consumption rather than for creation. Jobs said that for the iPad to make sense, it should be convenient for browsing, sending emails, enjoying and sharing photos, watching videos, listening to music, playing games and reading ebooks .

"If there is to be a third category of devices, it will have to be more efficient in this type of tasks than a laptop or a smartphone. Otherwise, there is no reason to be, "he said. With the iPad, "it's phenomenal to see a whole web page right in front of you and you can manipulate with your fingers".