[ad_1]
ALGONA, Iowa – That was the kind of question a politician should have been able to handle easily, but Rep. Steve King is not a politician.
"Do you think that a white society is superior to a non-white society?" Asked Mary Lavelle, 63, testing her reputation for sympathy for white supremacy.
"I do not have an answer to that. It's so hypothetical, "said King, Republican of Iowa. "I will say this, America is not a white society – it has never been a completely white society. We came here and joined the Amerindians.
He continued, "I have been saying for a long time that a baby can be taken out of the cradle anywhere in the world and transported to any home in America, no matter what the color of its inhabitants, and can be raised as an American. other. And I believe that each of us, each of us, is created in the image of God. "
Ms. Lavelle said she asked the question in this city of 5,000 people in northern Iowa because she feared that the anti-immigrant language used in a manifesto written by the suspect during the shooting at the The Christchurch mosque in New Zealand is unlike anything Mr. King said. His tentative answer to a relatively simple question may have done little to dispel these concerns, two months after Mr. King, Republican of nine terms long story of racist remarks, has been publicly reprimanded by members of his own party.
Republican House leaders removed King from his position on the committee in January, after questioning the New York Times about why the phrase "white supremacy" was considered offensive. A number of powerful party leaders, including senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, leader of the majority, and representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, Republican in House No. 3, have suggested that he resign and the House has pbaded an overwhelming resolution disapproving of Mr. King's statements. .
Mr. King remained provocative after losing his seats on the committee and issued a statement in which he claimed that his remarks had been misunderstood. He said that he spoke only of "western civilization" when he asked "how did this language become offensive" and not "white nationalist" or "white supremacist".
Mr King was again examined on Monday after an article on his Facebook page speculated that would win a second civil war between the red states and the blue states.
"People continue to talk about another civil war; One side contains about 8000 billion bales, while the other does not know which bathroom to use ", reads in the message, which has since been deleted.
On Tuesday, urged by a CNN reporter, Mr. King told his constituents that he "did not know" that the picture had been posted on his Facebook page the night before and that he was not managing personally this page.
"I would have liked that he never went up," he said.
But he also sought to deflect the issue by telling the reporter, "It's interesting that no one here has asked this question," while beckoning to his constituents.
"The only people who are interested in this are the national media. Nobody raised the issue here, "he said, pushing a handful of people to protest. The exchange was quickly picked up by American Bridge, a Liberal political action committee.
But Madame Lavelle was clearly concerned about Mr. King's inflammatory language. After being asked about the manifesto, Mr. King answered at length. He said that the author of the manifesto had expressed as much sympathy for communist China as white supremacy. "The further he went, the more he became incoherent and he seems to have had mixed and equal ideologies," he said.
Asked about the overlap between manifesto language and his, Mr. King replied, "He probably also used the same words as Mao."
[ad_2]
Source link
