[ad_1]
During the weekend, UEW hit the headlines for the wrong reason, forcing the institution to shut down. The decision to close the university became very important at a time when tensions on campus were high.
The students boycotted the lectures and decided to take to the streets to record their high level of revulsion and resentment as a result of the board's decision to dismiss senior lecturers. to vehemently oppose what they said had no legal basis.
These students took to the streets to demonstrate, on the simple condition that, until their teachers are reinstated, they do not give up their demands. They were ignored on Monday and the following days. The demonstration continued from Monday to Thursday.
It took the unexpected intervention of the MP for Effutu and Kennedy Agyapong to restore calm, which allowed the situation to regain some normalcy on UEW campuses. They managed to calm their cool and promised agitated students to forward their legitimate demands to the Minister of Education for possible considerations.
Mathew Opoku Prempeh and others then met with the chair of the board of governors to review student advocacy as a way to find an amicable solution to the problem. It was then agreed that, to avoid further agitations here and there, the sacked speakers should be reinstated so that the greatest peace reigns. The decision made by the Chair of the Board of Governors and other stakeholders was then communicated to the students in accordance with the peacebuilding process.
Students who were anxiously waiting for their applications to be considered after receiving rebadurance that their speakers would be reinstated would fall asleep, hoping that when the board of governors would formally sit down to speak to the media about it, it would be a good idea. Recent stalemate in the ETS, the decision to report their dismissed lecturers was actually part of the UEW Board of Directors' press release, but it appears that they were stabbed on the back.
UEW's board of directors in its yellowish, porous press release did not justify why these speakers were fired. The release was intended to detail the offenses that each of these speakers had committed and to explain why they had been subject to disciplinary proceedings under the UEW Constitution. Allow me to do good to my readers by reproducing them for a better understanding.
One of the fired lecturers, Dr. Frimpong Duku, was brought before a disciplinary board on the grounds that he had courageously filed an affidavit for and on behalf of some of the UEW's dismissed officers in the High Court.[ Volunti non fit injuria,ie voluntary badumption of risk]. He was also charged with appearing in court at the expense of lectures. He was found to be in violation of Law 36 of Annexes G2b and D, which was subsequently the basis on which he was dismissed. Let's turn to Bill 36, which specifically lists behaviors that deserve disciplinary action. The examples below are clbadic.
According to the Statutes of ETS 36, Appendix G: The following provisions are called disciplinary rules and, unless otherwise provided, apply to all University staff: (i) Any act done without reasonable excuse by a person to whom rules apply, which is tantamount to a failure to perform any of the duties imposed upon it, or to a violation of regulations, instructions or directives concerning employees of the University or which is by otherwise detrimental to the proper functioning of the University or tending to discredit the University constitutes misconduct. (ii) It is wrong for an employee of the University of 🙁 a.) to be absent from his / her work without permission or a reasonable excuse (b) to be insubordinate c. use, without the consent of the competent authority, property or facilities of the University for purposes unrelated to the work of the University and / or not part of its attributions (d) carry on an activity likely to lead the University to discredit (e) engage in a gainful activity outside the University without the consent of the Vice Chancellor.
The foregoing may trigger disciplinary action against a prominent member of the university, as it is rightly based in the aforementioned statute, which has already been reproduced above. It is shocking that the STE Governing Board did not establish any link between the allegations alleged by Dr. Frimpong Duku and any of the above behaviors that could lead to disciplinary action in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the STE mentioned above.
Obviously, no provision of the Statute supports the revocation of the appointment of Mr. Frimpong Duku. The question is why students will not protest against this heinous illegality? Professor Anthony Afful Broni, who did not check the exact spelling of his name before signing his signature on letters of dismissal intended for senior executives, is behind this capricious and vindictive decision that ignited the university for lack of a better expression.
Once again, let me move on to the dismissal of Professor Ephraim Avea Nsoh, who was director of Ajumako College. The board of directors laid three charges against him. He was presumed to have
(I) organized a conference / seminar on campus on a case that was before the high court
(II) Having repeatedly demonstrated that he had no respect for the authority
(III) Usually absent from duty without any reasonable excuse.
The lack of common sense of the STE board of directors has not even joined the official report and the recommendations of the Disciplinary Board to their publication, in order to give a clear picture of what is going on. they communicated to the public. In their failed attempt to throw dust in our eyes, they failed to mention the case that was pending before the High Court and the transcript of what Prof.Avea Nsoh openly said as a commentary on the case. the outstanding case that triggered the disciplinary actions against him.
Who informed the Board of Governors that when a case is in court, no one can comment on it. The only limitation to commenting on a court case is that which: (a) seeks to hinder the outcome of the case (b) any comment that seeks to undermine or reduce the outcome of the case; authority of the court (c) any comment that seeks ridicule the court.
Apart from the foregoing, any body is protected under Article 21 (1) (a) (b) to freely express its views on any matter that it considers reasonable and appropriate. Assuming, without admitting, that the alleged conduct of Professor Avea Nsoh was contemptuous, what aspect of the law provides for punitive measures for which he was brought before a panel charged with examining the 39, case in question?
Again, what aspect of Prof.Avea Nsoh's formal conduct constituted his charge under (II), which should be described as "non-respect of authority"? The Governing Council thought that this weak press release would solve the problems once and for all. all not knowing that it was going to expose their weakness to the public.
Anyway and considering that, he was absent from his duty without any reasonable excuse. What exactly is the duty of which he is supposed to be absent? who determines what is reasonable and what is not? The "sick" administration council of the STE is chaired by a professor, but the basic good sense is not in any of their positions concerning the subject treated.
In their press release, they also accused Mr. Emmanuel Sarpong of leaving the chairman of the board at a meeting of the board, while it was clear that he was not there. was challenged as a representative of the elders at a board meeting for reasons. He was not at the meeting in his official capacity as a lecturer, but as a representative of the elders. In this case, why would his "speaker" suffer from this by baduming that, without admitting it, what he recorded in the minutes is a mistake?
ETS is not the true faith of Prof. Anthony Afful Broni, vindictive and criminal minded. When you engage in videctivity, common sense will surely expose you to the world. Such a shameful attitude should not have come from a Catholic priest.
#Anthony Afful Broni must be forced to resign #
Dawda Eric (Equity)
Old UEW
March 19, 2019
[email protected]
[ad_2]
Source link
