[ad_1]
Although the company admitted in the publication that it was concerned about CA practices several months before its data collection was made public, it insisted that it "does not have a public record. absolutely does not induce anybody in error ". A spokesman said the employees were talking about a different problem in the email exchange and that it was not about AC data buying in Aleksandr Kogan. If you remember, the Cambridge University professor sold more than 87 million pieces of information to CA through his personality quiz app. The data extraction has not been contrary to Facebook's policies in the past, and the social network claims that it is precisely the sale of Kogan that was contrary to his TOS.
He said:
"In September 2015, employees heard rumors that Cambridge Analytica would collect data, which is unfortunately common to all Internet services, and in December 2015 we learned through the media that Kogan had sold data to Cambridge Analytica and we did different things. "
A few days ago, The Guardian also reported that Facebook executives had met with whistleblower Christopher Wylie in the summer of 2016, long before the scandal became public. In contrast to this incident, however, Facebook denied this incident and called it "categorical and totally false".
Source link
