MPs ready to take control and vote on Brexit options | Policy



[ad_1]

The government has virtually admitted that it will lose control of Parliament this week and that MPs will vote on various Brexit options, with ministers saying it would ultimately be useless for Theresa May to come up with her own plan.

It was then that May's hope that she could still enforce her withdrawal contract faded after a phone call with Arlene Foster, in which the leader of the Democratic Unionist party rejected a personal appeal to support .

At a meeting with Jeremy Corbyn on Monday, the Labor Party leader also rejected proposals that the Prime Minister's exit agreement could be separated from future relations.


Not enough parliamentary support to hold third Brexit vote, says Theresa May – video

A Labor Party spokesman said the two men had had a "free and full exchange of views" and Corbyn suggested that there was no reason to return to Parliament.

"The Labor leader has not accepted the Prime Minister's suggestion to separate the withdrawal agreement from the political declaration," the spokesman said.

It is understood that May hinted at her one-hour meeting with Corbyn that the government would not be bound by the parliament's decision in indicative votes.

The government will call Conservative members of Parliament against an amendment to a motion on Monday that would give members the power to control the Order Paper on Wednesday to prepare the ground for voting on Brexit options in Parliament.

May's of facto MP David Lidington, who will open the debate, had intense discussions with leaders of the group of MPs defending the motion, including Conservative MP Oliver Letwin, Labor's Hilary Benn and Stephen Kinnock.

However, government sources hinted that they had now admitted that May could not come up with her own version of indicative votes and that MPs were determined to continue their project despite everything.

Downing Street said May had said at a Cabinet meeting Monday morning that she would only be presenting a meaningful vote if the government felt she knew some numbers. In a phone call right after the meeting, Foster said that she would not change the position of her party. "The position remains unchanged," said one source.

May's spokesman said that there was a sense of "resolve" at the meeting and that the Prime Minister's future had not been mentioned by any minister.

A cabinet source said Jeremy Hunt wanted to delay the meaningful vote until April 12, to pressure Labor MPs to support the deal, for fear of leaving without an agreement, but that is not the case. was not supported by cabinet ministers deal with the table.

Several cabinet members also expressed concerns about the indicative votes organized by the government, fearing that they would cause chaos and lead to general elections.

Stephen Barclay, secretary of the Brexit, would have been the main spokesman for the general election risk if Parliament seized control of the Brexit by the government, saying it was necessary to have a vote. honor the 2017 election manifesto.

Monday's main amendment was tabled by Letwin and Benn, chairman of the Brexit Labor Select Committee, who on Wednesday reserved the option for MPs to take over the House of Commons' work to hold a series of votes on the different results of Brexit.

May's spokeswoman said the constitutional implications of the amendment raised concerns.

"The Prime Minister had already stated that tying the hands of the government in this way by seeking to bypbad the Order Paper would have profound repercussions on the way the United Kingdom is governed and on the balance of power and power. responsibilities within our democratic institutions, "the spokesman said.

According to the results of Monday 's talks and votes, the prime minister could still present a meaningful vote for Tuesday through an late – night emergency motion shortly after the vote of the legislators on Monday night.

[ad_2]
Source link