[ad_1]
Send your thoughts to [email protected]
Christmas message from Mike Dean
I have endured / enjoyed a strange mix of viewing choices this week, but some of them are at least partly relevant to my potential point. Please keep with me:
- The Crown (we do not know if their demography overlaps that of F365, but otherwise, it is a televised historical drama about the monarchy, peasant)
- Various documentaries about ancient Egypt
- Nathan For You (surreal genius worthy of Andy Kaufman)
- Youtube Super Mario Maker Videos
- Aaand finally … The Australian A-League CLASH between Brisbane ROAR and W Sydney Wanderers
For those who not seen the article A few clicks from here, they had the microphone for the entirety of his last match of the A-League.
His name is Jarred Gillett, he's one of the best officials in the A-League and he's on his way to our own championship next season.
I can not express (or rather I do not care about finding the exact words to express) how much I enjoyed watching the match with the addition of the microphone. This, of course, gave viewers a completely new vision of the game and the rules of the game, while illuminating in a fascinating way the human interactions between players and officials.
To return to the Crown for a second, we are in 1957 and Queen Elizabeth realizes that the monarchy must evolve over time and become more accessible to the public. She begins to broadcast the Christmas speech in her living room. The public can empathize with her and satisfy their curiosity at the same time. It is a great success, the monarchy and its subjects are united, etc. etc. or I guess so, I did not look at the rest.
I'd love (I adore, etc.) if they introduced a optional Micro power supply in England. I want nothing more than a Saturday to hear Mike Dean's husky baritone admonish an endless succession of people breaking the rules. I want to see how the referees deal with different personalities of players. I want to gain a different understanding of the game. I want to hear the alien soppy run / limp / roll in tears while Johnny English launches a new heroic challenge, before stopping to wipe his bloody boots on the grbad .
I will let anyone else determine why an optional micro power wire is not a good idea (do not say swear) because it is 6:30 am and that daylight begins to burn my skin.
Faris (the horrors of) Blackburn
No sorry for Sarri
As a fan of Chelsea, I completely disagree with JC's mail on Hudson-Odoi / Sarri / Chelsea.
First point, the power of the player. While this is clearly a problem in Chelsea, the idea that Sarri selects political teams to satisfy well-established key players is rather debatable. Danger at nine o'clock, when he clearly hates playing it? Abandon the popular Giroud for a 60% package and a reputation not established in Higuain? At the same time, by relentlessly selecting some other players, no name is required. Will hardly delight the dressing room is it.
Second, poor Sarri, under pressure to win the club and fans. Mysteriously, this pressure increases when the matches are badly lost. Then we expect to give chances to different players and to change tactics, and so on. The problem is that Sarri will be fired because it does not change anything, while alienating the club's best hopes, Loftus-Cheek & Hudson-Odoi. Sarri can not hide behind the logic of victory at all costs, he has clearly shown that sticking to his training, his approach and his favorite players is much more important than win games.
Pedro (31) and Willian (30), whose contracts are less than 18 months old, are essentially close to their shelf life in Chelsea and have few positive results. Given the ban on transfers and the interest shown by the major European clubs, it is ridiculous to see what is happening in Chelsea right now. Four starts in the last eight games have probably convinced Hudson-Odoi to stay. Will it happen? Not optimistic.
Prediction: Sarri gets us 6th place and in the final of the Europa League, where we lose to Napoli ?
Ben
A cunning plan
It is clear that racism is appropriate in any form, in any place, even inside a football stadium, and so we have to look for methods to try and get it right. Stop. There is much discussion about the need to strengthen the line of action with nations / clubs where incidents occur. This is reflected a few weeks ago when the violence and the fans on the ground were the subject of the day.
However, you can not only punish the group for the behavior of individuals. Why not stop opposing fans from sabotaging the process? Serbia is on its 2nd strike and is leading its qualifying group? Perfect, we will put ourselves at their side, do something inappropriate and they will throw the tournament! Hey, we won the group! Even if they are just bigger fines, there is room for sabotage. One could say that it is exaggerated, but it is certainly not beyond the possibilities.
More needs to be done in education and giving people the confidence to oppose ignorant and / or cultured people. And there is still a lot of work to be done to deter these people and punish them as a result. Clubs have a role to play in this regard, but you can not replace the punishment inflicted on the group by the individual.
Alex, Ayr
… all these discussions about zero tolerance are very good, but all I can think of is how convenient it would be to stand on the stage of a rival, under the colors of the Rival team, and carry out a nice set of racist slogans to: Make sure they fall below you in the league table.
Granted, you might need a few friends with you, but as long as you get good positions within voice range of the TV cameras, you should be ready to leave.
You could be beat for your troubles, but winning, that is winning, huh?
Benzoin
A happy Irishman?
Now, it is understandable that in football, the title requires a point of questioning. The marked decline of the Irish national team has been one of the most significant in the last decade. Not that we have ever been an absolute unity, but we could beat almost everyone nowadays (The Irish luck was more widely used at the time!).
The last two games may have been against Gibraltar and Georgia, and we probably have more difficult games to play in Denmark and the Chocolatiers, but we actually looked like they could play football, which is nice. Although there were pressures last night at times that were easily avoided, one feels. Nevertheless, if Ireland can continue to try to move forward and play pbades quickly, we may finally be able to start moving forward again.
Sean (Would he have scored without 5 minutes to wait before free? Yes he would have done it!)
Phil is safe. it is written
This is the highest scale I think I have seen over the years! Should Phil Neville be worried?
Edward Canhands (Tried to make an Irish ladder but abandoned)
So. A lot. Well. players
I will not precede this with an opening paragraph or anything, I just throw it in the trash; our U-21 team for this summer's championships (baduming fitness):
Gunn; Sessegnon, Timori, Gomez, Alexander-Arnold; Maddison, Rice, Foden; Hudson-Odoi, Abraham / Solanke, Sancho.
It's pretty ridiculous for a formation of less than 21 years old. And frankly, the pants are very exciting. Of course, there are the first finals of the League of Nations this summer, but with the current strength (for once) deep within the national team – as evidenced by your own famous ladder – Southgate could still line up a strong senior team without the need for above: Pickford; Chilwell, Maguire, Stones, Walker; Alli, Dier, Henderson / Barkley; Rashford, Kane, Sterling
(Yes, there could be injuries in both games, but there are still other senior players in reserve at Trippier, Rose, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Lingard, Loftus-Cheek, Lallana, Winks and others. so fall this minor enemy of sight for the moment …)
Really, I would just like to see an emphatic winning mentality instilled in this new generation of players, a victory mentality that has been so striking for so long by its absence among former senior players. Surely, with the abundance of relative wealth at its disposal, is the perfect opportunity for Southgate to do exactly that? Despite all the intrigue and revitalization that it has brought to the international friendly format, the League of Nations is still an exhibition tournament without prestige. And as this is a biennial, this is why the young people above will hardly consider this year's potential pot as a missed opportunity if they leave it for under-21s; they would still be mostly under 21 at the next League of Nations in 2021!
This could really be a golden opportunity for England to build on its recent under-17 and under-19 triumphs, like Germany and France, and placing their young candidates on the road to future success. And from elsewhere, when was the last time England won the U-21 European Championship? 1984. Yes, thirty-five years ago. Mark Hateley was the top scorer. Does not that make you feel very, very old? I rest my case.
Rich, wolves
[ad_2]
Source link
