General Khalifa Haftar travels to Tripoli



[ad_1]

The lavishly disastrous disorder that is Libya has embarked on a new phase of inspired aggression on the part of General Khalifa Haftar. As he does, Prime Minister Fayez Al-Sarraj, supported by the UN, is worried. For about three weeks, the eastern forces of the general, known as the Libyan National Army (LNA), have been heading for the fractured state capital in hopes of suppressing the remaining "terrorist groups" in the region.

The National Agreement Government (GNA) does not receive support votes in foreign capitals that it might once have enjoyed. At the beginning of April, Al-Sarraj wanted to emphasize his point of view on the return of Libya to a state of normality without conflict. "We will not abandon our principles and peaceful solutions to reach a civil state, to ensure that the totalitarian regime or the militarization of the state does not return."

A national dialogue leading to "the unification of institutions and the holding of presidential and parliamentary right-wing constitutional elections allowing citizens to be heard" has been put in place.

General Haftar, a veteran of the Libyan war in Chad in the 1970s and 1980s and a former CIA aide, preferred to spoil the party by his own efforts to besiege the capital, despite efforts by Western diplomats to discourage him. His argument for attacking Tripoli since the chaos of 2011 has turned to the weak efforts of Libyan interim officials, whom he accuses of being unaware of the problem of the Islamist militia. His response to the militia problem was to create his own group of motley militias. It takes one to get rid of it.

Al-Sarraj is doing everything in his power to ensure that his forces respect the rules of international humanitarian law, in the hope that it will keep it in good books and add to others. A counter-offensive has begun and clashes have been reported in Wadi Rabea, Airport Road, Ain Zara and Khalit Al-Furjan.

While the recognized government struggles, old accusations and suspicions are also playing out. Al-Sarraj and his colleagues are convinced that the general receives support from external sources, although their remarks are somewhat disordered. There is no doubt that the badistance received by Haftar from the United Arab Emirates and Egypt has refined the equipment of the LNA.

Russia is anxious that Haftar not be given full responsibility for the new series of spoliations; The United States seemed confused about this at the UN Security Council, although President Donald Trump contributed a lot to the confusion. (Formerly, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had called Haftar to stop his attack.) In conversations with Haftar, Trump appeared to be approving the efforts of the LNA leader. to restore order. In a phone call, Trump "recognized the important role of Marshal Haftar in fighting terrorism and securing Libya's oil resources.The two men discussed a common vision of Libya's transition to Libya. a democratic and stable political system ".

With the regime in Tripoli isolated, Libya's Interior Minister Fathi Bashagha led the recriminations. France, although it provided six patrol boats to the forces of Al-Sarraj as early as February, not to mention the formation of the presidential guard, was described as mean. The Interior Ministry has suspended "all relations between the Ministry and the French side … because of the position of the French government in favor of the criminal Haftar".

European politicians are watching the latest wave of violence with less concern for the humanitarian consequences for Libya than for the shaky security situation ahead. Former Italian Minister of the Interior, Marco Minitti warns: "If the war persists, all those fleeing the clashes will turn into refugees, in accordance with international conventions, which will bring among them foreign fighters from from Syria and Iraq who usually use chaos for one another. "How inconsiderate of them.

The French answer was that of raised shoulders and some regrets. But the final picture is one of typical indifference that undermines. France, badisted by the United Kingdom and the United States, led the campaign to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi, with catastrophic consequences for a state that has ceased to be.

Since 2011, calling Libya an operational political entity is a charade of grotesque proportions badisted by forced theater on the diplomatic scene. The post-2014 civil war, following the internationally recognized expulsion of the Libyan parliament by forces working with the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, was marked by the continuation of a crippling conflict . What is clearly not a charade is the increasing number of dead and refugees, which means that this failed state is poised to become the next blood-soaked Syria.

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College in Cambridge. He teaches at RMIT University in Melbourne. E-mail: [email protected]

Warning: "The views / contents expressed in this article only imply that the responsibility of the authors) and do not necessarily reflect those of modern Ghana. Modern Ghana can not be held responsible for inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article. "

Reproduction is allowed provided that the authors the authorization is granted.

[ad_2]
Source link