[ad_1]
<! –
->
IMANI Africa has said it has not committed any offense demanding that it apologize to the Fueltrade bulk oil distribution company.
The company apologized to the political think tank after its vice president, Kofi Bentil, asked if the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation's (GNPC) CEO, Dr. Kofi Koduah Sarpong, was in conflict with an agreement between the company and Fueltrade.
According to Mr. Bentil if the claims of conflict of interest prove true, The position of Mr. Sarpong at the head of the GNPC, which is the government's main negotiator on oil issues, raises questions.
TIn a press release, the GNPC boss called the complaint a false identity and denied any involvement in the company, demanding a retraction and an apology in two weeks.
Fueltrade, in a similar reply, rebutted allegations that its shareholders would be MM. Chris Chinebuah and Dzifa French Cudjoe, who have all the legal interest and benefit for society.
"Fueltrade categorically declares that it does not legally or effectively belong to K. K. Sarpong and / or his family," the statement said.
Dr. K.K. Sarpong
According to them, by claiming that Fueltrade was unethical and involved in an unethical (lies-based) business and for unacknowledged reasons, Imani Africa and Kofi Bentil caused the company to be unethical. embarrbadment and damage to the reputation of the company.
"We asked our lawyers to ask for a retraction and an apology from them. If no manifestation of remorse materializes, we will take all necessary steps to protect our business and our hard-earned reputation."Said the company.
But it seems that may not happen.
On Friday, in Joy FM's Top Story, Bentil defended what he said at the press conference.
He explained that in the process of collecting information for the press conference, some names were constantly appearing, suggesting that Dr. Sarpong had something to do with Fueltrade.
"When we checked, the Fueltrade directors did not include Dr. KK Sarpong, however, we were also presented with other information that it was possible that he had that control or that control. We were not ready to take this value.
"So we made a cautious remark saying that there was control on this side and that we were using the word" we need clarification, because it is so, it would be a conflict of interest, "he added. .
In his opinion, the questions were raised so that Dr. Sarpong could erase his name – which he did.
"We did not mention Fueltrade in a pejorative way and we did not try to do it. We believe that the judicious choice of our words does not constitute a defamation of Dr. Sarpong, "he said.
He thinks the fact that the GNPC CEO has said he has nothing to do with the company is a good thing: "We accept it and we can move on. If someone raises his name, we can send him his own negation of control.
"… By saying that it is alleged that there is a problem and asking for clarification, we have committed an offense for which there must be an excuse," he added.
[ad_2]
Source link
