[ad_1]
Behavior Summary
In 2017, Washington, DC's Sheriff's Office became the first law enforcement agency to use Rekognition, Amazon's facial recognition tool. Then, for two days in March 2019, the office granted journalists The Washington Post access to his squad cars and facilities to observe the evolution of technology in cop operations.
What these journalists discovered was that the police were using Rekognition well beyond Amazon's intentions, particularly to identify unconscious suspects, people who refused to identify, corpses and even police sketches. – a striking example of the technology already used. to be misused by the forces of order in nature.
No trust
Amazon advises law enforcement officials to use Rekognition results only if the technology is 99% convinced that it has found a match. The company also said WaPo Although the execution of police sketches by Rekognition does not contravene any rule, Amazon expects the man who reviews the results to pay close attention to the trust given to all matches obtained in this way ".
But according to WaPoDetailed reports, released Tuesday, indicate that Washington County officials do not even see the extent of search reliability when they use the system. The five most likely matches are searched, regardless of Match Recognition trust and whether the capture is a photo or sketch.
Draws Leads
In summary, the number of potential problems with the use of recognition by the Washington County Sheriff's Office is staggering.
AI experts said WaPo the use of sketches instead of photographs could lead to more false matches. Officers could then try to force their investigations to match these false matches, according to Marc Brown, Deputy Chief, Office of Public Defence, Oregon.
"You've been told that this was the one, so when you investigate, you'll have your mind in mind," he said. WaPo. "The question is no longer who committed the crime, but where are the evidence to support the badysis of the computer?"
Ethical violations
In addition to the practical problems of police following suspicious leads – and possibly false arrests – civil rights issues also need to be addressed.
Using Rekognition on unconscious suspects or those who refuse to identify – an act that is not illegal in the state of Oregon – Oregon officials deny these people of their ability to consent to exams.
In the end, if there is one thing to learn from WaPo According to investigations, until lawmakers begin to regulate facial recognition, law enforcement officials will use the technology as they see fit, even if it means arresting innocent people or violating their civil rights.
READ MORE: Oregon has become a testing ground for Amazon's facial recognition police. But what happens if Rekognition is wrong?[[[[The Washington Post]
More on recognition: Police officers misuse Amazon face recognition software
Source link
