Ashley Jacobs claims that Patricia Altschul manipulated her in a conspiracy against Kathryn Dennis



[ad_1]

Southern charm Star Ashley Jacobs is back in Season 6 and she's not really sorry, is she? Jacobs made his comeback this week Southern charm, alarming his comrades of the cast with his arrival. And right now, things became hairy. Fans may remember that Jacobs was last seen in a quarrel with Southern charmPatricia Altschul, as well as Kathryn Dennis. Although the quarrel with Dennis has somewhat disappeared, the dispute between Jacobs and Altschul continues. In fact, she now claims that Altschul manipulated her in the past.

Not happy to see her again

Ashley Jacobs, Thomas Ravenel
Ashley Jacobs, Thomas Ravenel | Paul Cheney / Bravo / NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images

Ashley Jacobs and her ex-boyfriend and former Southern charm star, Thomas Ravenel, surely did not make many friends during his tenure in the series. Far from that, actually. Ravenel and Southern charm Star Kathryn Dennis separated in 2016. Since then, they have reconciled in court. Jacobs started dating Ravenel and attacked Kathryn Dennis, calling her "egg donor".

That said, it is perhaps not surprising that the cast is not thrilled with Jacobs' return. Cameran Eubanks told Entertainment Tonight: "I was shocked when I saw Ashley. But then, I was not there. I hoped that if she had the sense, she would return to California, where she is from, where she is from, where her family and friends are. I can not believe that she stayed around.

Kathryn Dennis said about Jacobs: "I think nature is going with humans like her. I mean, it self-destructs and that's what nature does. It's hard to find words to talk about her because she does not make sense herself. "

Patricia Altschul's feelings on Ashley Jacobs

Ashley Jacobs, Thomas Ravenel
Ashley Jacobs, Thomas Ravenel | Paul Cheney / Bravo / NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images)

Feuding with Patricia Altschul is a mistake, many Southern Charm fans would agree. The big show lady has clbad, wit and a lot of friends around her at all times. So, when Altschul claimed that Jacobs had harbaded one of his close friends, the fans shook their heads. Some fans badume that the friend in question is Luzanne Otte, whom Altschul introduced to Ravenel – they had a brief romantic relationship.

Altschul clarified his aversion to Ravenel and Jacobs on Twitter. "Why are people asking? Because of his campaign of defamation and that of Ashley, his character badbadination, his lies and his willful defamation. "

"And add to this list an innocent friend of mine who was fiercely cyber-bullied by Ashley because of her obsession and insecurity," Altschul tweeted.

Altschul told Entertainment Tonight, "She did the opposite of everything I told her to do. I would say it did not work for her … She's sort of an example of what not to do. If you could write a list of things not to do, she would personify that. "

Ashley Jacobs says a plot

Austin Kroll, Ashley Jacobs, Thomas Ravenel and John David
Austin Kroll, Ashley Jacobs, Thomas Ravenel and John David "JD" Madison | Paul Cheney / Bravo / NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images

Now, having been confronted by a colleague Southern charm Ashley Jacobs claims to have been admitted by Patricia Altschul. While the cast members were skeeting, Cameran Eubanks confronted Jacobs about his behavior.

"You called Kathryn an egg donor, it's pretty bad, Ashley," said Eubanks.

"I took the bait," Jacobs said in return. "I was a pawn in all that. Everyone says it's Thomas, it's Thomas. Do you want to know who is constantly talking to Kathryn? Patricia. "

Jacobs added, "She's pissed me off. And she would say, "Do not say anything to anyone that I said to you." I believed in Patricia. I mean, I respect her, she can not lie to me. If Catherine is my enemy, it's because Patricia has made me my enemy. She wanted to destroy it. The best way for her to do this was to befriend me.

Distribution members find it difficult to believe Jacobs, largely because of his past behavior and their own relationship with Altschul. What do you think?

[ad_2]
Source link