[ad_1]
Quick History Lesson: Diana was the Roman goddess of hunting and wild animals. (It was also a fertility deity that our counterparts at the time tried to summon to help them get pregnant.)
But unless you put leather on the elbows of your tweed coat, it's not who you think when you hear "Diana". Because only one woman is badociated with this name and she was a complicated, seductive mother, wife and friend, whose life was marked by grief and an endless quest for love.
Nevertheless, if the bookies are correct, there may soon be another Royal Diana in the world. At present, in the United Kingdom, at Ladbrokes, the Duke and Duchess of Susbad are very unlikely to name their future Bambino the name of his mother. Add the title this little girl would badume and that would mean that Harry's firstborn and Meghan would be known as Lady Diana.
And it would be a big mistake.
RELATED: Wills and Kate ask for tea with Meghan before the birth of the royal baby
RELATED: How Meghan urged the UK to activate Kate
RELATED: The Huge Meghan of the Palace and Harry Gaffe
Eight years ago, Prince William knelt in front of a secluded cabin in Kenya and finally put the question to his incredibly patient girlfriend of almost nine years, Kate Middleton.
Rather than go see Garrard, pick a big diamond, throw his titanium credit card and go home to watch the billiards on TV, Wills decided instead to recycle the engagement ring of Diana. Later, he said that he wanted his mother to be part of this chapter of his life, all in beauty. But the reality is much more complicated.
Of course, he gave Kate an incredibly precious rock with a huge sentimental meaning. But he also psychologically and physically imposed on him the legacy of a world-famous woman (at least outside the doors of Buckingham Palace). No pressure at all really! Just try to become the princess of the 2.0 people!
(I also find it curious that he chose to combine it with a jewel so symbolically linked to his disastrous marriage with Charles.)
That's exactly why Ginger Charmer and Meghan have to keep their name "D" safe if they have a daughter. It would be a brief public relations win for his parents, but it would be a permanent plague for the poor child's existence.
If they decided to follow this path, the new Lady Di would face a life of relentless comparisons with her grandmother's feeling around. Her clothes, looks, choices and connections would all be presented and badyzed through the perspective of the Princess of Wales.
I think Diana 2.0 would still look like the slightly inferior version, a mediocre facsimile of a woman who has touched millions of lives. This would mean that the new Diana would be doomed to live all her life in the shadow of a woman canonized by a nation in mourning and whose name is synonymous with eternal style, charity and very bad luck in love. .
In fact, it's a really terrible legacy, like the Toby Pitcher collection of your little aunt Pearls. Nobody wants it.
If the Susbad even considered the option "Diana" (rather than saying Aria, Riley and Layla, three of the most popular names in America in 2018), they would radically disadvantage their chances of living a life defined by itself . terms and for her to be able to create her own identity.
So, I really hope that Harry and Meghan will surprise us (as well as all those bettors who have put their hardness earned on it) and adopt something totally unexpected.
Personally, I would love to see Lady Cayenne Mountbatten-Windsor Breeze on the balcony of Buckingham Palace for the show of Trooping of the Color: this girl will not wade in the wake of anyone.
Daniela Elser is a royal expert and freelance writer with 20 years of experience. She has written for some of the best Australian brands of print and digital media. | Continue the conversation @DanielaElser
[ad_2]
Source link
