Does Jon Moxley think that WWE will improve with Triple H support?

This is an issue that Wade Keller repeatedly tries to get a direct response from former Dean Ambrose about the first part of their interview with the marathon.

What he gets, as you can see in these episode responses Wade Keller's professional wrestling podcast Jon Moxley said, "Well, it can not be any worse with Vince McMahon in charge."

When Keller asked if Moxley thought that the success of Triple H in NXT allowed him to handle the biggest machine that made up the main list, he got:

"I mean, who else is there, you know? He is clearly prepared for that. When Vince is not here, that's the type you're talking to, so … he has good ideas. His ideas are his ideas, but he is much more – he is very cerebral. He is not like a super collaborator, like 'oh cool! do this, do that … "He thinks a lot. But I just think it's a much better option, you know? [laughs]"

When asked if the game at the helm would change the creative process of the WWE that frustrated Moxley so much, the AEW star said:

"I think he'd be more willing to give people more freedom, but I also think – he's smart and sees things his way, so if he sees you doing something and he's considering a better way, he will come and say to himself, "Hey, just let me ask you a question, maybe we can do it that way?" And you often say, "oh, it's even cooler Because he likes to see TV and he is, I guess, the closest to Vince.You have to ask someone in NXT that, you know, who is right around this system … for you to give a real, what would it look like, you know? "

As a follow-up, the facilitator asked if the people that Moxley was working with and who had been led by Hunter in NXT were looking forward to it. Gross and Smack downor if the calls tell you, "count your blessings, Vince is still alive." He still does not get a firm answer, yes or no:

"But it would not be like it was free for everyone now. He will often explain to you – for example, there are times when I wanted to do things and he would say "no, we can not do that", and I would say "why not" You know, I want to bleed everywhere or whatever, and he will say, "If we do that, I think you find it cool, but we're going to lose a $ 10 million sponsor," and it's a little hard to argue … so it's not stupid, so it would not be free for everyone, but maybe it would be better, I do not know. "

From reading what Mox says here, my interpretation is that it would depend on whether Trips would be ready or not to dismantle the infrastructure and bureaucracy created by McMahon. Both men seem to be the final decision maker and Moxley does not seem to have a problem with that. That's all you need to do to get to Vince, and you have extra work to do because of the timing / how your decisions are communicated.

Bottom Line – Moxley does not just mean, "Yes, Triple H will save us all." But how many times does he identify Vince as the problem of WWE – in his Talk Is Jericho interview & this one – and the NXT product produced by Triple H, many of us prefer Gross And Smack down… it always seems that a change at the top of creation would be a positive thing for WWE.

Check out every 90 minutes of the first part of Keller's interview with Dean Ambrose here.