[ad_1]
Facebook follows users and former employees who, in his opinion, represent "threats" to his staff via a "BOLO" list. This practice has been described as "very big-esque brother" – even for the social media giant.
Facebook "Mines" its network of threatening comments, according to CNBC, who spoke to more than 12 former employees about how the company deals with perceived threats. Then, it uses the location data of applications installed on the phones of users whose threats are deemed credible in order to follow them.
Any user who publicly threatens Facebook – by repeatedly appearing on the company's property, creating long-term email threats or even posting messages. "improper" Comments in response to public missives by CEO Mark Zuckerberg or Operations Director Sheryl Sandberg – can be found on Facebook "BOLO" ("to be on the lookout") list, where hundreds languish in secret.
What is a threat? "Thanks, Mark,""F * ck Facebook," or "I'm going to kick you" are sufficient, according to a former staff member of the executive protection team, although another said that decisions were made on a case-by-case basis and that there were no strict guidelines. Facebook claims that no one is added without "rigorous examination" to determine the severity of the threat, but former employees are in agreement "the bar can be quite low."
More worrying are the former employees who are on the list, reported and followed by their former colleagues. "Almost all Facebook employees get fired" added to the list, according to some former employees, who described the process as "really subjective." Even entrepreneurs are added to the list if they get "Emotive" when their contracts end.
While Facebook claims that former employees are only added for valid reasons, such as threats of violence or harbadment, former workers interviewed for an interview with other positions were denied. entry due to BOLOing – and why would Facebook want to rehire someone who had threatened violence or harbaded coworkers?
The social network uses the location data collected through its own application and the IP addresses collected through its website to track users logged on BOLO, although a former employee claimed to deploy this feature only when threats were famous. "credible," Emphasize user locations have never been triangulated for no reason. Nevertheless, the BOLO list included hundreds of people in 2016, including names, photos, locations and a brief description of what they had done to be on the list.
Also on rt.com
Facebook could face a record fine for non-respect of privacy – reports
Facebook has denied doing anything that comes out of the ordinary, claiming that it was being used "Industry standard measures to badess and address credible threats of violence against our employees and society, and to refer these threats to law enforcement when necessary" – although with the sheer size of Facebook, its access to personal data and its tracking capabilities, it is probably able to set its own "industry standards."
"We have strict processes designed to protect the privacy of individuals and to comply with all data privacy laws and Facebook terms of service, any suggestion suggested by our on-site physical security team is absolutely false" , A Facebook spokesman told CNBC – a statement that must be made with skepticism by anyone monitoring the company's privacy history.
You think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
Source link
