Ghana: European Commission Charges of Fraud Prosecute Charlotte Osei Until Afghanistan



[ad_1]

The Afghan media began to publish the allegations of fraud that led to the dismissal of the first president of the Ghana Electoral Commission, Charlotte Osei, currently European Commissioner for Elections for the United Nations in Kabul, Afghanistan.

Ms. Osei went to Kabul on Tuesday, May 28, 2019 and began work. Ms. Osei joins a team of UN-appointed election experts from around the world to provide technical support, capacity building and advice on best practices in health and safety. Elections to the electoral complaints commission and the independent electoral commission to establish a peaceful democratic process. credible elections as Afghanistan prepares to hold presidential elections in September 2019.

Ms. Osei is a lawyer who has served as EC chief in Ghana since 2015 until her dismissal in June 2018 for financial malfeasance, an allegation she denied.

Even though she is now on an international mission, the same problems that led her to leave her home seem to have followed her to Kabul, Afghanistan, when the media started wearing clothes. accusations of fraud against him.

One of those reports was by the Daily Outlook Afghanistan as shown below http://www.outlookafghanistan.net/national_detail.php?post_id=23824:

Ghanaian Commissioner for Foreign Affairs of CEICC accused of fraud

KABUL – According to the electoral law, two members of the IECC should be outsiders who would share their experiences with local commissioners for free and fair polls and put their expertise into practice for transparent polls.

Charlotte Osei has broken public procurement laws by signing several contracts ahead of the 2016 elections in Ghana, the Graphic Online said.

Their deportation was based on the recommendations of a committee that had investigated allegations of corruption and malpractice against them. They accused Mrs Osei of taking unilateral decisions without recourse to the competent services of the EC.

The group also accused the president of EC of having engaged in fraudulent activities, citing her decision to cancel a contract awarded to Superlock Technologies Limited (STL) for the supply and management of machinery and equipment. 39; biometric voter registration (BVR) and biometric voter devices (BVD), as well as its directive for the payment of $ 76,000 to the computer company, Dream Oval.

After about a year of investigations, the Chief Justice's Committee reported to the Chair.

The Minister of Information, Dr. Mustapha Abdul-Hamid, said: "This is following the committee set up by Chief Justice, Judge Sophia Akuffo, under the authority of the law." Article 146 (4) of the Constitution, to investigate separate complaints filed by Ghanaian citizens against the three people, recommended their dismissal. "

It is proven that, prior to the 2016 general election, the Electoral Commission had secured support from USAID donors through the Ministry of Finance.

The badistance was for $ 2,367,500 that the Electoral Commission was to use to improve its computing environment.

In October 2016, the President, the Finance Minister / Designate and the USAID Mission Director signed a grant document titled "Implementation Letter No. 641-Ai-FY14IL No. 03 under the DOAG No. 641-001, Strengthening Reactive Democratic Governance for Support to the Ghana Electoral Commission for a New Activity: Improving Inclusion in the Electoral Process of Ghana (hereinafter referred to as grant").

In the context of an offer to obtain the services of a contractor for the said project, the Commission received three quotes for examination. Indeed, according to the president, she personally recommended Dreamoval Ltd, a group of Ashesi University.

She testified that the Chief Financial Officer had submitted the names of two other companies, namely Premium Tech & Business Consultancy Services and Change Investment (Ghana) Ltd.

The president, the finance director and the donor office manager chose Dreamoval for the contract.

As a result, an initial contract of $ 32,510.00 was awarded to Dreamoval Ltd. to redesign a website for the Electoral Commission.

After the completion of the initial contract for the redesign of the Election Commission's website, Dreamoval was to offer extensive technical services to the voting panel to protect the website that was the subject of a cyber -attack.

According to the president, Dreamoval Ltd needed to work 24 hours a day to prevent a website breakdown. After extended work, Dreamoval submitted an additional invoice of $ 76,000.00.

The President discussed Dreamoval's new bill with USAID, which agreed to pay provided that a contract exists for additional or additional work done by Dreamoval.

There is evidence that, apart from the refurbishment contract of the UNDP-financed Commission Strategic Plan, Quazar Ltd has been awarded another contract to develop a logo for the group at a cost of 23,470. 01 GHC.

This contract was funded by the Government of Ghana. Upon completion of the work, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accountant wrote to the Bank of Ghana on March 8, 2016 to transfer $ 6,080.31, the equivalent of GHC23,470.01 to Quazar Ltd's account. at the First National Bank, Guateng. .

Two contracts were awarded to Quazar Ltd. The first concerned the repackaging of a UNDP-financed commission strategic plan.

The second contract for the development of a logo for the commission was funded by the Government of Ghana. It is clear from the evidence that the allegation that the President unilaterally awarded contracts to Quazar Ltd is false.

The contract for the repackaging of the strategic plan was awarded at the end of a stakeholder meeting at the request of UNDP.

The contract was awarded after three quotes submitted by three companies were evaluated by an evaluation panel consisting of three people and chaired by the finance director of the electoral commission.

On May 31, 2016, the Finance Director of the Commission wrote to the UNDP Country Director to make direct payments to Quazar Ltd for the work performed.

The problem with the contract awarded to Quazar for repackaging the strategic plan was the method used to engage Quazar Ltd.

The evidence revealed that the Commission used a limited tendering process, which identified three firms to submit their bids.

In view of the fact that the restricted tender was used, the prior approval of the public procurement officer was required under Article 38 of Law No 663, as amended. modified, for the process to be lawful.

[ad_2]
Source link