Harry and Meghan's baby projects will be private, says Kensington Palace



[ad_1]

The Duke and Duchess of Susbad are photographed at the Bristol Old Vic Theater on February 1

The Duke and Duchess of Susbad are photographed at the Bristol Old Vic Theater on February 1

The Duke and Duchess of Susbad will announce the birth of their baby only when they will "have the opportunity to privately celebrate their new family", revealed today the Kensington Palace .

Meghan is expected to give birth at home at Frogmore Cottage, in Windsor, which she shares with Prince Harry in the Berkshire estate.

She wants to follow in the footsteps of the Queen, who was born at her grandparents' house in Mayfair and gave birth to her four children at Buckingham Palace or Clarence House.

A spokesman for Kensington Palace said: "The Duke and Duchess of Susbad are very grateful for the goodwill they have received from the UK and around the world as they prepare to welcome their baby.

"Their Royal Highnesses made the personal decision not to divulge their plans for the arrival of their baby.

"The Duke and Duchess are looking forward to sharing this exciting news with everyone once they have had the opportunity to privately celebrate their new family."

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle visit New Zealand House in London on March 19th

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle visit New Zealand House in London on March 19th

Kensington Palace says Duke and Duchess of Susbad should keep details of arrangements for the birth of their baby

Kensington Palace says Duke and Duchess of Susbad should keep details of arrangements for the birth of their baby

Sources pointed out earlier this week that Harry and Meghan, who are expecting their first child in the coming weeks, have not ruled out a hospital delivery, as a woman with a baby over 35 has a risk increased premature birth or epidural need or caesarean section.

But a friend in America said that the Duchess – who still practices yoga every day and has "sailed" throughout her pregnancy – is in very good health and sees no reason why she could not benefit from it. 39, a safe delivery in the privacy of the cottage.

"It's his favorite choice," said the source, "but that obviously depends on how things get closer to the hour."

If she gives birth at home, Meghan could give birth without any pain relief, but would also have the opportunity to use air and gas, a warm bath, a delivery basin, the TENS (a machine that uses small electrical impulses to reduce pain and muscle spasms) or relaxation techniques such as hypnobirthing, which the Californian Meghan – who advocates a lot of alternative therapies – would have studied with Harry.

Harry and Meghan would have quickly ruled out the use of Lindo Wing's private wing of St Mary's Hospital in Paddington, like William and Kate (photographed with Prince Louis on April 23rd). from last year).

Harry and Meghan would have quickly ruled out the use of Lindo Wing's private wing of St Mary's Hospital in Paddington, like William and Kate (photographed with Prince Louis on April 23rd). from last year).

It is understood that the 34-year-old prince would be alongside his wife "every step of the way". This option would also have the added benefit of giving the couple the confidentiality they desire.

The Duchess of Susbad attends a reception at Buckingham Palace in London on March 5th

The Duchess of Susbad attends a reception at Buckingham Palace in London on March 5th

It is understood that they quickly ruled out the possibility of using Lindo's private wing of St. Mary's Hospital in Paddington as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Kate delivered George, five, Charlotte, three, and Louis, 11, to St Mary's.

However, it is thought that Harry and Meghan decided not to do so because it looked too much like a "goldfish bowl".

The Duchess objected to the idea of ​​standing on the marches of the maternity unit surrounded by the public and the media just hours after birth, especially when her child would not be in a direct line.

Last week, it appeared that the couple had also made it known that he wanted minimal involvement from Queen's doctors, gynecologist surgeons Alan Farthing and Guy Thorpe-Beeston, generally considered the best in the industry. Sources said that saying it was a "boom" was "far from the goal", however.

"When it comes time to give birth, every woman needs to decide what is best for her and her baby. The Queen's team will be involved, but we have not decided how much yet. "

Opting for a birth at home would also explain why the need for a consultant would be minimal, in addition to confirming that the baby is fit and healthy.

The queen gave birth to each of her four children at Buckingham Palace or Clarence House (photographed with Prince Andrew, age four, and a newborn, Prince Edward, in June 1964).

The queen gave birth to each of her four children at Buckingham Palace or Clarence House (photographed with Prince Andrew, age four, and a newborn, Prince Edward, in June 1964).

Home births account for only about 2.3% of births in England, or one in 40, and are usually conducted by a local midwife.

The NHS offers community midwives, but it is also possible to hire an independent midwife at a cost of between £ 2,000 and £ 5,000.

Meghan, however, will have to take into account that, for women who have their first baby, birth at home slightly increases the risk of serious problems for the child – five out of 1,000 for a childbirth at home. hospital nine out of 1,000 for a home birth.

That said, the royal family has a long history of successful deliveries at home. The Queen Mother gave birth to the Queen on April 21, 1926 in London, at her grandparents' house, the Count and the Countess of Strathmore.

The Queen herself gave birth to Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward at Buckingham Palace or Clarence House.

Harry and Meghan, who completed their move to Frogmore last week, see the cottage as their "forever home". They believe that it will allow them to raise their family outside the control of the palace life.

How home births are not normally recommended for your first child

Home delivery is generally considered a safe option if women have ever had a baby – provided that there have been no complications.

But they are not normally recommended for those who have their first child.

This is due to the fact that new mothers may have problems during delivery that require cesarean delivery or forceps delivery, which can only be done at the hospital.

In recent years, health officials have been trying to encourage women to consider having their baby at home or in a delivery unit rather than at home. ;hospital.

Not only are these options less expensive for the NHS, but they also offer a more relaxing experience, away from the stress and noise of a busy work pavilion.

In addition, many NHS trusts do not have the capacity or the funding to provide midwives dedicated to the management of delivery units. But many women are naturally reluctant to see their babies away from the hospital in case something goes wrong, and they are far away from doctors and nurses.

The most recent figures from the Office for National Statistics show that only 2.1% of women in England and Wales gave birth at home in 2017. The others had their babies at home. 39 hospital or in a unit led by a midwife, although the data do not give the respective figures.

There are no official figures on the safety of home deliveries compared to those held at the hospital or in smaller delivery units run by a midwife.

The guidelines of the Nice health monitoring body, published in 2014, indicate that women do not need to make an appointment for a hospital delivery unless they present a high risk of complications. They may consider a birth at home if they have ever had a child. But if it's their first child, they should go to a unit headed by a midwife. The directive says: "Midwives should explain to the expectant mother that she can choose any place of birth … and support her in her choice."

"Midwives should advise low-risk women who have had at least one child to plan for delivery at home or in a midwifery-led unit."

Tommy's advice, which funds research on stillbirth prevention, says, "If you've ever had a baby and this pregnancy is low risk, giving birth at home is usually a safe and appropriate option."

[ad_2]
Source link