Health experts turn a blind eye to teenage girls' vaping



[ad_1]

HScience officials have accused public health officials of minimizing the risk of teenage smoking, including the one who discovered that electronic cigarettes cause lung damage.

Public Health England (PHE) ignores "evidence" that vaping is harmful, putting Britain "out of step" with countries such as the US where teenagers are actively warned about products, said the experts.

Dr. Aaron Scott, a scientist from the University of Birmingham, who showed that vaporized e-liquid fluid had a similar effect on the lungs, like ordinary cigarettes. Funding for long-term research on the misdeeds of vaping has been stifled, because "PHE wants message that they [e-cigarettes] are not harmful ".

Professor Martin Mckee, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, echoed his remarks and warned PHE to turn a blind eye to growing evidence that young people are trying to get away from it. Shorten and are attracted to the brands and marketing of electronic cigarettes.

The organization claims that the UK has some of the world's most stringent e-cigarette advertising and minimum age regulations.

However, PHE figures show that the number of British kids and teens attempting to try vaping has doubled in recent years.

According to 2018 data, about 15.9% of children aged 11 to 18 reported trying to vapot, up from 8.1% in 2014.

The proportion of people who said they had never tried e-cigarettes went from 91.5% in 2014 to 83.4% in 2018.

Prof McKee said that PHE "seemed to be doing everything in its power to promote electronic cigarettes" and had chosen to ignore warnings about the risks.

He said: "The nicotine in electronic cigarettes is not a harmless drug, then all those other things, such as inhaled flavors.

"We have not had electronic cigarettes for long enough to know the real effects.

"But when we look at the evidence we have, there are enough reasons to seriously worry.

"Given the short-term effects on lung function and cardiovascular effects, there is enough evidence to say that we should be very, very cautious."

[ad_2]
Source link