[ad_1]
<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "
This may have made the headlines, but it was little surprise that Huawei signed a contract this week with the Russian MTS network operator to develop a 5G network over the next year. In April, the Moscow Minister and CIO & nbsp;Eduard Lysenko m said& nbsp; that Huawei would be included in the country's plans, adding that "the Russian Federation has strict rules on information security that we always follow," when I asked him about the so-called risks security with Huawei. As I said at the time, Russia and Washington have different views on the threat to national security of Huawei's alleged links with Beijing.
The announcement of the deal, which coincided with the meeting of the two Chinese, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, in Moscow, was announced by Huawei's rotating president, Guo Ping, who said& nbsp; was "very happy to get an agreement" in an area of strategic importance like 5G. "China itself also announced this week 5G licenses for China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom and China Broadcasting Network: Needless to say, Huawei is firmly locked up. & Nbsp;
And so to the divided world.
After a week or so US President Trump and British Prime Minister discussed Huawei, with the intention of the United States to block the company's access to the 5G networks of its closest ally, the & nbsp; Technical Director of the British Center for British Cybersecurity again criticized Huawei technology. "bad quality."
Ian Levy said at a conference "Huawei, as a company, builds its products very differently than its Western counterparts, partly because of the speed with which they grew up, partly because culture – who knows. " When asked if it meant that Huawei had bigger technical problems than his Western competitors, Mr. Levy replied, "What we learned as a result of that, security is objectively worse and we have to deal with that … Certainly nothing is perfect, certainly, Huawei is of poor quality, the others are less so. "
This is not new news. Earlier this year, the & nbsp; dedicated & nbsp; from the United KingdomThe Huawei Cybersecurity Assessment Center said it had & nbsp;"continued to identify problems with Huawei's approach to software development significant increase in risk for UK operators. "& nbsp;But what is clear is that, despite the promise to invest in improvements, UK officials publicly state that little has changed. "They have a lot of work to do, and I think they know it," Levy said, conceding that "you would not expect that, within six months of the publication of this report, it would be inferior to this one: "we have corrected it", it would be unachievable. "
That said, in the 2019 report, the UK's Huawei Assessment Center also criticized the company for its lack of improvement since last year's report was released. & Nbsp;"NOTo material progress was made on the issues raised in the previous report of 2018, "the center reported," In other words, the limited badurances that & nbsp; all UK national security risks resulting from Huawei's participation in the UK's critical networks can be sufficiently mitigated in the long term. "& nbsp;So there is a model that is emerging
The American political reaction against the UK's decision to allow Huawei to be part of its 5G network has taken the politicians by surprise. This decision was awarded to outgoing premier Theresa May and is therefore likely to be reversed. The fact that the intel community is aware of the problems will not be a coincidence.
And so to Google.
the biggest headlines of Huawei in the last month have been reserved for the flagship business of the smartphone business. Various reports from Asia suggest a sharp drop in shipping forecasts for the remainder of 2019 as the company seeks to recover from the US blacklist that has seen its supply chain of hardware and software suspend his future collaboration.
The real successes of Huawei come from Google, with its Android software and services, and ARMS, with its ubiquitous smartphone chip designs. And although some badyzes have been done on the realistic realism of replacing more traditional chips with Huawei 's internal chips, there has been much more badysis and speculation about Hongmeng or Ark, the system of Android alternative exploitation (imminent) imminent.
Now, according to the Financial TimesGoogle warned Washington of the potential risks to US national security that could result from custom-not-fixed Android systems on Huawei phones, or a completely different operating system. the FT reports that "Google says that a version of Android modified by Huawei would be more likely to be hacked, according to people informed of his lobbying efforts. "& Nbsp;
The real problem, however, is that a Chinese alternative to the most popular smartphone operating system in the world is likely to disrupt the global smartphone ecosystem. And as it says in the paper that Chinese piracy may exist, the real problem is commercial in nature. US companies are already at risk of losing significant revenue from Huawei's blacklist. A radical change in the entire smartphone ecosystem would take time to emerge, but it would be much worse if it ever happened.
the FT Google quotes: "Like other US companies, we are working with the Commerce Department to ensure that we fully comply with its requirements and temporary license." Our goal is to protect user safety Google on millions of existing Huawei handsets in the US and around the world. "& nbsp;The Commerce Department replied: "This is not new to this administration, and these discussions do not influence the actions of the forces of order. The highest priority of the department and the BIS is the protection of the security of our country. "
There are real risks to national security in the battle of Huawei with Washington. But there is also the backdrop of a world that is divided technologically. The Internet is already very different in China and the West. And Russia is flirting recently with its own tailor-madeemergency use only"The Internet that could disconnect from the Internet as a whole has raised fears that it is moving in the same direction." This would clearly have an impact on US companies given their dominant positions on a set Internet hardware and software technologies.
For the United States, all this throws even more moving elements into an already complex area, including the very real risk that a divided Internet will dissipate the liberating impact that the Internet has had in some of the darkest corners of the world. for a generation. As countries learn to set up national firewalls and China is happy to show the way, we risk going backwards. Thus, in the political and economic spheres, the issue of macroeconomic priorities is about to become very real. In the meantime, he will remain daily & nbsp; small victories and threatened answers, without that changing anytime soon.
">
Bloomberg Finance LP 2016
This may have made the headlines, but it was little surprise that Huawei signed a contract this week with the Russian MTS network operator to develop a 5G network over the next year. In April, Moscow Minister and IOC Eduard Lysenko I said that Huawei would be included in the country's plans, adding that "the Russian Federation enforces strict security rules with regard to information security, which we always follow," when I l & # 39; I asked about Huawei's alleged security risks. As I said at the time, Russia and Washington have different views on the threat to national security of Huawei's alleged links with Beijing.
The announcement of this deal, which coincided with meetings of Chinese Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin in Moscow, was announced by Huawei's rotating president, Guo Ping, who said was "very happy to enter into an agreement" in an area of strategic importance such as 5G. "China also announced this week 5G licenses for China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom and China Broadcasting Network. without saying that Huawei is firmly blocked.
And so to the divided world.
At the end of a week during which US President Trump and British Prime Minister discussed Huawei, the United States wanting to block the company's access to 5G networks from its most trusted ally. Nearly, the technical director of the British National Cyber Security Center again criticized Huawei's technology. like "poor quality."
Ian Levy said at a conference that "Huawei, as a company, is building things very differently than its Western counterparts, partly because of the speed with which they have grown. also be cultural – who knows. " Asked that this meant Huawei had bigger technical problems than his Western counterparts, Levy said, "What we've learned from this is that security is objectively worse and we have to deal with it … True, nothing is perfect, Huawei is bad, others are less so. "
This is not new news. Earlier this year, the United Kingdom devoted Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Center reported that it "continued to identify problems with Huawei's approach to software development significant increase in risk for UK operators. " But what is clear is that, despite the promise to invest in improvements, UK officials publicly state that little has changed. "They have a lot of work to do, and I think they know it," says Levy, conceding that "you would not expect that in six months we released this report, less than that, that they go out "we solved the problem. It would be unachievable. "
That said, in the 2019 report, the UK's Huawei Assessment Center also criticized the company for its lack of improvement since last year's report was released. "NOTo material progress The center reported on issues raised in the previous 2018 report, which means limited badurances that Huawei's involvement in the UK's critical networks can undermine national security in the long run. So there is a model that is emerging.
The American political reaction against the UK's decision to allow Huawei to be part of its 5G network has taken the politicians by surprise. This decision was awarded to outgoing premier Theresa May and is therefore likely to be reversed. The fact that the intel community is aware of the problems will not be a coincidence.
And so to Google.
Huawei's headlines over the past month have been reserved for the company's flagship company in smartphones. Various reports from Asia suggest a sharp drop in shipping forecasts for the remainder of 2019 as the company seeks to recover from the US blacklist that has seen its supply chain of hardware and software suspend his future collaboration.
The real successes for Huawei come from Google, with its Android software and services, and ARM, with its ubiquitous smartphone chip designs. And although some badyzes have been done on the realistic realism of replacing more traditional chips with Huawei 's internal chips, there has been much more badysis and speculation about Hongmeng or Ark, the system of Android alternative exploitation (imminent) imminent.
Now, according to the Financial TimesGoogle warned Washington of the potential risks to US national security that could result from custom-not-fixed Android systems on Huawei phones, or a completely different operating system. the FT reports that "Google says that a version of Android modified by Huawei would be more likely to be hacked, according to informed people of its lobbying efforts. "
The real problem, however, is that a Chinese alternative to the most popular smartphone operating system in the world is likely to disrupt the global smartphone ecosystem. And as it says in the paper that Chinese piracy may exist, the real problem is commercial in nature. US companies are already at risk of losing significant revenue from Huawei's blacklist. A radical change in the entire smartphone ecosystem would take time to emerge, but it would be much worse if it ever happened.
the FT Google states: "Like other US companies, we work with the Commerce Department to ensure that we fully comply with its requirements and its temporary license." Our goal is to protect the security of users of Google on the current millions of Huawei users, combined in the United States and around the world. The Commerce Department replied: "This is not new to this administration, and these discussions do not influence the actions of the forces of order. The highest priority of the department and the BIS is the protection of the security of our country. "
There are real risks to national security in the battle of Huawei with Washington. But there is also the backdrop of a world that is divided technologically. The Internet is already very different in China and the West. And the recent flirtation of Russia with its own "emergency-only" Internet network, which could disconnect from the wider Internet, has caused concern to think that it could go in the same direction. This would clearly have an impact on US companies, given their dominant positions on a set of Internet hardware and software technologies.
For the United States, all this throws even more moving elements into an already complex area, including the very real risk that a divided Internet will dissipate the liberating impact that the Internet has had in some of the darkest corners of the world. for a generation. As countries learn to set up national firewalls and China is happy to show the way, we risk going backwards. Thus, in the political and economic spheres, the issue of macroeconomic priorities is about to become very real. In the meantime, it will remain a daily lot of small victories and threatened answers, without it changing anytime soon.
