[ad_1]
On May 1, the New York Times wrote an article entitled "Huawei's Communist Culture Limits Global Ambitions." The report showed Huawei's deep roots in the Communist Party. In a book written by Huawei's CEO, Ren Zhengfei, he writes, "What's wrong with the effort? We learned it from the Communist Party. We will strive to achieve communism until the end of our lives. "
The links between Huawei's CEO and the Communist Party are about the United States, because Huawei's communications equipment can help Chinese hacker groups steal US intellectual property for the Chinese government.
This image is what Huawei's CEO is trying to change with his many interviews with Western media. He likes to rent Apple as his tool of choice to try to attract the ropes of American consumers.
Huawei's CEO congratulated Apple's co-founder, Steve Jobs, for creating the mobile Internet era in mid-April. He is back in the press, praising Apple's position on users' privacy as a way to try to erase the image of his ties with the Communist Party. What better way than to protect data from Chinese government users?
CNBC pointed out in a report released today that in an interview with the Financial Times, Huawei's CEO said that Apple was his model in a scenario in which the Chinese government is asking the company to unlock its devices that could go against the interests of users.
Zhengfei pointed out that his company would not provide the Chinese government with user data at any price, contrary to the way Apple does not provide data that could compromise the privacy of its users.
The US government has banned Huawei from operating in the US in the interest of national security, saying Huawei is working hand-in-hand with the Chinese government.
Zhengfei, as always, argues that this is not the case. CNBC cites Zhengfei in the Financial Times: "The data belongs to our customers, not us, the operators must follow each user, otherwise no phone call would be possible, it is his responsibility to track the data of the users. as a supplier equipment, do not track any data. "You can read more of the CNBC report here.
Huawei's CEO may like Apple, but if you have spent time watching Huawei presentations, you know that they make fun of Apple at every possible turn. Throwing a bone to Apple does not impress anyone. The biggest problem with Huawei is far beyond Apple.
Earlier today, the Financial Times Study finds Huawei resumes show close ties to military The findings feed into the debate over whether Huawei's 5G networks pose a security risk.
FT notes in its secondary report that "a study of the employment information of thousands of Huawei employees revealed deeper links with the Chinese military and intelligence service than those previously recognized by the largest Chinese manufacturer of telecommunications equipment.
The findings of these discussions are likely to fuel the debate among governments around the world on the opportunity to block Huawei's equipment when deploying 5G telecommunication networks for security reasons.
The research was conducted by Christopher Balding, professor at Fulbright University in Vietnam, and by researchers at the Henry Jackson Society, a British think tank. By browsing a database of Chinese CVs disclosed, they have found Huawei employees who appeared to be simultaneously employed by institutions affiliated with the Chinese army, others who previously worked in areas related to telecommunications piracy or surveillance, and others still who described their work in Huawei as being related to the Ministry of State Security (MSS), an entity involved in cyber warfare and network penetration.
Professor Balding identified an employee of Huawei who describes himself as a "representative" of the MSS at Huawei and claims to have worked to "enhance the legal interception capability of Huawei equipment".
The researchers suggest that this employee could have been involved in the alleged installation of backdoors – illegal access points that could allow eavesdropping of sensitive communications – in a Vodafone network in Italy a decade ago, which had been reported for the first time earlier this year. "
The report went on to say that Vodafone and Huawei had claimed that any security problem causing a security breach had been resolved long ago.
The FT report added that "Elsa Kania, expert in Chinese military innovations in emerging technologies and civil-military fusion in China – practice in the country of close cooperation between military entities and on the subject of technology, called Mr. Balding's paper a very valuable contribution, though inconclusive in some respects.
The research is likely to fuel the debate over Huawei, as US government officials quarrel with the industry after Washington blacklisted Huawei earlier this year. Decisions are also emerging in several EU member states, including the UK, on how to mitigate security risks in 5G networks.
Professor Balding went on to say that "Huawei has given a lot of trouble saying that they have no connection with Chinese military and security institutions. The narrative that they tell is wrong – military relations are clearly very deep. "
The Financial Times report is very interesting and you can read more here.
Christopher Balding's study entitled "Huawei Technologies Links to Chinese State Security Services" can be found here.
In late December, the FBI and the Justice Ministry announced that two Chinese men had been indicted as part of a mbadive hacking campaign that had stolen personal and confidential information from companies around the world, announced at a press conference in Washington, DC.
The men, Zhu Hua and Zhang Shilong, are part of a group called Advanced Persistent Threat 10, or APT 10, a hacking group badociated with the Chinese government.
According to the indictment, from about 2006 to 2018, APT 10 has conducted extensive computer hacking campaigns, stealing information from more than 45 victim organizations, including US companies. Hundreds of gigabytes of sensitive data have been secretly collected from companies belonging to various business sectors, such as health care, biotechnology, finance, manufacturing, as well as oil and gas. the gas.
At the time, Christopher Wray, director of the FBI, had called the list of companies not mentioned in the indictment of "Who's Who" of the global economy. Even government agencies like NASA and the Ministry of Energy were among the victims. Piracy was part of China's ongoing efforts to steal intellectual property from other countries.
Shortly after, Bloomberg reported that the FBI had organized an attack at CES 2019 and that the target was Huawei. A series of events and evidence has led the current Huawei blacklist of the US government to become part of the US communications infrastructure.
Then, on January 28, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn accused the company and its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, of several counts of fraud and conspiracy.
A little behind, Wanzhou was arrested in Vancouver on December 1, 2018. For Canada, it was an extradition case. Yet, to help the US in this case, the Chinese government has eased the pressure on Canada by severely restricting imports of products such as canola seeds, beef and pork products, oil, etc.
Why would China be so tough on Canada for its minor role in leading Huawei 's board of directors, unless we like this story more. This story only grows with time and Huawei is at the center of everything.
In the end and in its context, Huawei's CEO, congratulating Apple for its position on confidentiality, is actually only a tool in the CEO's toolbox to try to deny that his company is working with various security institutions in China.
Of course, others will disagree simply because the CEO of Huawei has praised Apple's position on privacy, even if it is a bit short-sighted. The debate over Huawei's connection with Chinese government hackers will continue for months and possibly years before it is resolved or will ever be resolved.
About commenting on our site: Apple reserves the right to publish, reject or modify any comment. Those who use abusive language or negative behavior will end up with a blacklist on Disqus.
[ad_2]
Source link
