[ad_1]
Each party had 15 minutes to prepare for the debate, after which it presented a four-minute opening statement, a four-minute reply and a two-minute summary. Meanwhile, the audience of 100 was made up of the best debaters from the San Francisco Bay Area schools and more than 100 journalists.
Miss Debater (formerly known as Project Debater) extracted arguments from her database of 10 billion sentences from newspapers and journals. A female voice emanating from the human-sized black box gushed from her answers as three blue balls floated around her screen.
The confrontation was the last event in IBM's "big challenge" series pitting humans against its intelligent machines. In 1996, his computer system beat the grandmaster of chess Garry Kasparov, although the Russian later accused the IBM team of cheating, which the company denies until then. nowadays. Then, in 2011, his supercomputer Watson broke two records Peril! the candidates.
In the run-up to Monday's fight, Natarajan suggested that the debate could prove to be a more challenging battleground for AI than for gaming and video games. "Debating is … more complicated for a machine than for any of them, but a successful debate has three parts," he wrote in a LinkedIn article.
"First, a debater must deal with large amounts of information and develop relevant arguments. [explaining] complicated arguments in a clear and structured way. Third, you must make these arguments important to the public. This requires careful use of language, emotions, rhetoric and examples. While one machine should excel in the first, the last two can be difficult. "
But he also conceded that "there will soon be a point where AI will be better than humans at all three". Does that mean he's ready for a rematch?
Source link
