[ad_1]
When MobileMe is renamed Monday as iCloud, one of the most anticipated features is the ability to scan your iTunes library and automatically mirror it to the cloud without downloading a single audio file. The big question about scanning and syncing is whether it will only work with tracks bought on iTunes or with tracks taken from CDs, bought on Amazon MP3 or – yes – even pirated. Apparently … because Apple will pay the record industry for every pirated piece.
In a fascinating article by Weldon Dodd on GigaOm about the complications involved in negotiating license agreements for iCloud with music labels, there's an interesting rumor: Apple's small amount for every song synced with iCloud, even though it's n & # # 39; has not been purchased on iTunes.
If you think about it, it makes sense. Apple can choose to pony a small amount for each song and ignore if it is hacked, or pay even more money in extraordinary bandwidth costs, while millions of users download gigabytes of data on their servers . Apple has the money to take the leap of faith, which will probably save them money at the end of the day and provide a better user experience. From this point of view, it is obvious.
Dodd raises another interesting point: by refusing to sign licenses with music labels, Amazon's Cloud Locker and Google Music services have actually offered Apple a small fee for each song. more attractive for a music industry suddenly paranoid to drop in the cold. By refusing to sign offers, Amazon and Google unwittingly gave iCloud a significant advantage over their own services.
Fascinating things. If that's true, I'm personally relieved: I think that only three tracks of my vast iTunes library have been purchased through iTunes. And you? If scanning and syncing only works for songs purchased by iTunes, how much of your music collection will you need to leave on your hard drive?
[ad_2]
Source link
