[ad_1]
Ibrahim Sannie Daara – Complainant
The Accra Human Rights Court, chaired by HE Judge Nicholas Abodakpi, said the undercover investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas and his leader, Tiger Eye PI, had to defend themselves in court about the human rights case brought against them by the Ghana Football Association (GFA). spokesman, Mr. Ibrahim Sannie Daara.
Judge Abodakpi struck the affidavit of Mr. Odei Krow, counsel for Cromwell Gray, lawyers for Anas and Tiger Eye PI, to oppose the plaintiff's statement in the Ibrahim Sannie Daara case. V Anas Aremeyaw, Anas & Tiger Eye.
The judge described as "incompetent and inadmissible" the defense of Anas to ask his lawyer to respond to the complaint on his behalf for security reasons.
Instead, the respondents were ordered to file a new affidavit in response within 14 days.
Counsel for the accused stated, in an affidavit contrary to the facts, that he was neither aware nor aware of the documentary.
The court considered that this violated the rules of the High Court.
He therefore quashed the affidavit as being contrary to the rules of the court and ordered the accused to ensure that the parties to the complaint or persons having first-hand or factual information swore before the affidavits and not before a lawyer.
Mr. Daara sued Anas and Tiger Eye PI for human rights violations following the screening last June of issue 12, on widespread corruption in Ghanaian football, in which the spokesman the FA was accused of alleged corruption to influence the choice of a player. the national team.
[ad_2]
Source link
