Killer of Christchurch mosque faces "unprecedented" sentence



[ad_1]

While 50 people were killed in the rampage, the police have so far charged Tarrant with a murder leader.

Christchurch, New Zealand:

Brenton Tarrant, a man suspected of being armed in a mosque, faces "unprecedented" sentence that prevents him from demanding his release, but could still dodge terrorism charges, AFP legal experts said on Monday.

The 28-year-old Australian has been charged with a murder charge for the murder of 50 people in the city of Christchurch in the south of the country, and faces life imprisonment.

In New Zealand, being convicted of murder usually amounts to a minimum of 10 years in prison before being released on parole.

But legal experts have claimed that Tarrant's alleged crimes were so extreme that they could justify the harshest sentence imposed by a judge of the South Pacific nation since the abolition of the death penalty in 1961. .

"He could be sentenced to a term of imprisonment without the possibility of parole.There is a very important possibility," AFP lawyer Simon Cullen told AFP. such a conviction would be "unprecedented".

"This seems to be … the kind of situation that might well attract attention on this type of punishment."

The longest murder sentence ever pronounced in New Zealand was handed down in 2001, when a judge sentenced William Bell to life imprisonment with a minimum sentence of 30 years for a triple murder.

According to the Auckland Penal Procedure expert, Bill Hodge, despite the fact that Premier Jacinda Ardern qualifies the mbadacre for the act of terrorism – prosecutors might well avoid the terrorism charges.

The law on the suppression of terrorism was adopted only in 2002, after the attacks of September 11 in the United States, and has not yet been tested in court.

"We have never used our anti-terrorism laws and these laws are designed to prohibit or prosecute those involved in groups, funding, publications, etc.," Hodge told AFP.

"I do not think there is any reason to use statues that have not been used before, while the law on crimes – murder, attempted murder, manslaughter – is perfectly functional and well understood. "

Hodge said that Tarrant's charge under the anti-terrorism legislation was likely to prolong the appeal process.

"This has not been tested in the appeal process.The call courts indicate where the problems might be."

While 50 people were killed in the rampage, the police have so far charged Tarrant with a murder leader.

This is not unusual in New Zealand, with the first alleged offense being used as a "charge" when police conduct their investigation, Cullen added.

Meanwhile, experts said the charges against an 18-year-old man, whose name had been repressed by a court on Monday for broadcasting Tarrant's live film on deadly shootings, were also an innovation.

The teenager was charged with two counts for sharing the attack's data feed and for publishing "objectionable" online publications on one of the mosques.

Until now, the police do not think that the teenager is directly involved in his attacks.

Hodge said the law is commonly used to prosecute people accused of sharing badgraphy and child badgraphy.

"I'm not aware of using it for terrorism-related topics – it's unusual … when it's used to share something that is a news event," he said. he declared.

(With the exception of the title, this story was not changed by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Get the latest election news, live updates and election calendar for Lok Sabha Elections 2019 on ndtv.com/elections. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram for updates on each of the 543 parliamentary seats for the 2019 Indian general election.

[ad_2]
Source link