Labor withdraws Kyoto credits to achieve Paris goal | Australia news



[ad_1]

Bill Shorten said it was very unlikely that the Labor Party would use Kyoto Protocol carryover credits as part of its climate change policy, which will be unveiled in the coming weeks.

In his most forceful comments to date, the union leader said this weekend that he had acknowledged that other countries had decided not to use the accounting system that allows countries to count the credits exceeding their targets during the Kyoto Protocol periods, which will soon become obsolete, against their 2030 emission reduction commitments in Paris.

"One thing I recognize about Kyoto credits is that some other countries have decided not to use that, as a form of calculation, the UK, Germany, New Zealand, Sweden and Denmark, "Shorten told the press.

"We are seriously considering this option and we will have more to say in the coming weeks."

Shorten's signal follows the similar allusion made a week ago by climate change spokesman Mark Butler to a candidates' forum in a marginal Victorian siege. According to a participant in the Corangamite electorate forum on March 18, Butler said he did not personally want to use the postponements if Labor won the next federal election.

Work has already published its emission reduction policy in the electricity sector. In a short time, the opposition will unveil the rest of its political measures, which should include an exchange system for the responsible entities – the big polluters emitting more than 25,000 tons of carbon per year; new standards on vehicle emissions to reduce pollution in transport; measures for agriculture; and its final position on the use of international permits and Kyoto credits.

The Morrison government opposes the use of international permits, but recently confirmed that it would accumulate a contribution of 367 megatonnes of carryovers as part of its recently released carbon budget, which details the reductions programs of various programs necessary to achieve the goal of Paris. .

In addition to deferrals, the government has just under 100 megatonnes of reduction in "technology solutions", which have not been specified, and "other sources of reduction".

Environmental groups oppose the deployment of carry-over credits in the Emission Reduction Toolkit, as this reduces the level of ambition for reducing emissions.

The Climate Change Investor Group, which represents institutional investors such as super funds, with total funds under management of approximately $ 2 billion, also cautioned against accounting to the practical abatement, arguing that the practice is "fundamentally at odds with the limitation of warming the goals of the Paris agreement and the global impetus for a coordinated and increased ambition".

The Greens criticized the Labor Party if it decided to use postponements for the imminent task of reducing emissions.

Greens spokesman on climate change, Adam Bandt, recently said that it was possible for ALP to leave its options open with regard to Kyoto credits, as it could be forced to count on credits and permits to reach its 45% reduction target of 2005 levels by the year 2030, which will be imposed if the Labor Party wins in May.

The Greens argue that Labor's decision to apply their 45% overall goal to the electricity sector, instead of imposing a more abrupt reduction in electricity, where it is Comparatively cheaper to reduce pollution means that it will have to pursue a more onerous reduction in sectors such as heavy industry, transport, agriculture and waste.

Bandt argued that Labor may not be able to achieve its goal "without relying on Scott Morrison's accounting trick".

[ad_2]
Source link