[ad_1]
Send your thoughts to [email protected]
Goals on the outside
Two late goals for City give us an insurmountable 6-2 lead in the return leg. In my humble opinion, these doubles goals should be reflected in player statistics for the season. (I'm joking)
Garey, I enjoyed the conspiracy theories, but not as much as I enjoyed watch the video againit's a beauty thing. I do not cry, you cry.
Now I have twelve Diamond Geezer items to go through, I can not wait to see that.
Matt, MCFC, Dubai (on loan).
Handball
As a former lawyer and eternal pedant, I would like to challenge one of Steven Chicken's arguments in his otherwise excellent article on the handball. Although, as he says, relatively few offenses require the arbitrator to find a "deliberate" action, most serious offenses committed during the game are not in fact "objective liability", but require that the referee read in the player's mind.
In Law 12, direct free kick fouls require that the action be "careless, reckless or using excessive force". The first of these three conditions means a foul, the second a yellow card, the third a red one. In the sense that these terms are defined, although "excessive force" does not imply the player's mental state, "imprudent" always implies it and "imprudent" most often.
An "imprudent" action means "when a player is acting without regard to the danger an opponent runs or the consequences of that for his opponent". Ignoring is a mental state. A "careless" action means "when a player lacks attention or consideration when he launches a challenge or acts carelessly". Lack of attention and lack of consideration are mental states, and you could argue that acting without care is too, though I do not insist.
That said, the main idea of the article, that we need a clearer handball rule and a clear protocol for VAR handball calls, is quite correct. Certainly, no rule will be perfect, but for the moment, things could hardly be more complicated.
Peter G, Pennsylvania, USA
I'm sitting listening to the daily podcast 5 Iive on the handball var in the city game.
What the hell is Danny Mills?
"Every time the ball hits the hand in the area should be a penalty." He says that it will facilitate the choice of a penalty. Then he says that the referee will be able to see if the attacker has deliberately kicked the defender 's arm and that he can then book the attacker for unpleasant behavior.
Later, he says that decisions will be made during a season and that people will accept it.
He has absolutely no idea.
I'm not really sure about the value of this project, but I really regretted that someone who played the game and who is well paid to give an opinion may be wrong.
Kevin (do not get me started on Martin Keown). ITFC. Vancouver.
I really do not see the difficulty of determining whether a handball was deliberate or not.
You just need to meet both these conditions:
1. The culprit saw the ball arrive.
2. The offender has moved or adjusted his body to stop or change the trajectory of the ball.
You can not blame clumsiness. These people are professional athletes.
Apply a little common sense.
Bryan
All about politics
I never, and I mean, never been a baseball player, even when my team was received by some humdeurs and I never understood those who do it. Referees and their colleagues who make slightly odd, mediocre or even scandalously bad decisions are also present in the fabric of football, for example, Cantona Kung Fu who hits a fan. When a field player makes bad decisions time and time again, you can talk or blow or be exasperated or scream at the tone or on TV, but when a goalkeeper makes ONE, it's time for steel helmets because the finish will be (mainly) too hard. But it's human nature. It's unpredictability and randomness that make football both exciting and extremely frustrating. The decisions of the officials in this mix are no different. That's why we read, comment, comment, discuss and discuss what happens in every game we watch. If all these factors were absent, we would look at a sterile and non-controversial version of Basketball. 92 goals v 89 ffs.
It is also for this reason that I like GLT because it is the whole ball on the whole line or it is not the case. VAR does not work and can not do it, and therefore does not improve the crucial decision making of officials, especially because the imperfect human element remains. Anyone who declares or infers that VAR should or wants to get rid of it is, at best, dishonest. This can not, irrefutably, prove those who shout PEN! or dive! good or bad 100% of the time. You are reading this now, where you are now, and in the relationship you are in now (even if it is at all good, bad, or indifferent), precisely because of the decisions you made in your life up to Now. Have you been 100% correct every minute of every day of YOUR professional life?
And it is at that moment that I will say this. Schalke v City game last night. After all that I wrote, I could not help thinking "Hmm. Spanish referee with a manager who supports an independent Catalonia and who openly wears a yellow ribbon ". Although I love him for what he did / does, I do not agree with Pep or any other sports professional, mixing football with politics. But he (the referee) does not hesitate to return Schalke's decisions to VAR at the beginning of the match but clears the City counterparts in the 2nd half (B Silva was never a pen) without flinching. Did his monitor work then? And may I just point out that UEFA is doing everything it can to avoid political contentious appointments. Ukraine v Russia for example.
Mark (Occam's razor, he's a kid). MCFC
The real problem of VAR
I am a fan of the city and until last night, I was a big fan of the VAR. Now? Not so sure – but not for the simple reasons you could imagine regarding the first penalty (I really did not believe it). My big complaint was the way I reacted to the last winner of the sterling. I thought at the beginning that he may have committed a foul on the defender and therefore, even if the goal had been scored, there was an insinuating doubt that the referee, this referee, would send him back to VAR . So we waited a few moments and a few more moments before celebrating. It has just taken away some of the unmixed joy of the moment and it's a big thing in football, in sports in general, where the key moments of any competition can often be counted on one hand. I tried to explain to the American friends the anticipation and the explosion of joy that can give a late 1-0 victory – it's not to criticize other sports, but it's a rather unique feature of soccer. If VAR can remove that, then I think we would lose something special.
I understand the arguments for VAR, I have them myself over and over again. All that happens to the right answer must be good, right? But I'm not sure if the price is worth it if it means that we lose that vital element of joy and emotional release that we get from scoring a key goal.
The fact is that if the referee can not review an interpretable decision, the dealer can not play the role of referee. Obviously, he did not see it and could not badyze it and should not have let VAR decide it alone.
I know other club fans will have all sorts of myopic opinions on this, but the fact is it will happen to you someday and it's a strange feeling to want to celebrate, but to know that you will have to wait for it. make.
Nobody likes being premature
Steve. Manchester. Most certainly MCFC.
And…
Delighted with the result tonight considering the circumstances, of course. But, my faith, what VAR is becoming a debacle, and its implementation has posed many problems tonight. Certainly more than I would like to take care of tonight.
Whether you thought it was a penalty or not, the fact is that this decision was made by those who were in a room upstairs, which is a flagrant violation of the rules. If the referee needs to see him himself on the sideline to make the call, but can not do it because of technical problems, well I'm sorry, but it's just difficult bads. It seems obvious to me that in this case, the referee was forced to make a decision that he could not see and that he did not take himself. Ergo, VAR laws were violated when awarding this penalty.
What's more, what makes football and its too much personal importance allow it to think that it can make video replay differently – ie with much more pomp and circumstance – than anything else? other sport? When you look at how smooth and transparent technologies are implemented in tennis, cricket, rugby, etc., it is frankly frustrating to have to go through the shenanigans that VAR creates. I have the impression that FIFA / UEFA has done its best to make the VAR bigger and better than any other sport because you know we are football, rooaarrrr! All they have done is extend and complicate something we could all do at home with Sky +. Absolute wankers, a lot of them.
I am also very unhappy with Pep for not starting Sane and Zinchenko tonight. Of all that I have seen tonight, I think it was the clearest and most obvious mistake.
Rusty Blue, MCFC
Ask the important questions
Super free kick and all that …
But let's focus on what's important here … what was that song after the town match?
Jon, Lincoln
The was another game
I imagine that most of the letters this morning will focus on City's comeback against Schalke. Here are some thoughts on the great match between Atletico Madrid and Juventus, which the Spaniards have rightly won 2-0.
• Atleti deserved full victory and margin. Their stubbornness did not always make them the most attractive team to watch, but they had the bump in their teeth and played very good things.
• Juve was very lucky that it was not a bigger score; the decision to score Morata's goal was ridiculous. Chiellini falls to the ground after minimal contact with the attacker. It's a big shame too, because it surely would have complimented the fans and heightened his confidence.
• As expected, Atletico has always been a danger in sets. Griezmann's deliveries were superb – his effort to beat Szczesny at his first goal was wonderfully bold (Chris Sutton said the goalkeeper was delighted), but the pressure exerted later in the game for both goals.
• It was not just his prepared pieces that were good: Griezmann played well all night and only got a great chip thanks to a great stoppage of the fingertips on Juve's Polish # 1. . Fantastic game all around.
• It's typical when it was the two central defenders who scored for Atletico. Both goals showed vigilance and determination to score. Gimenez's shot was born out of a pure desire to break the stalemate, but Godin's goal was particularly well chosen – it takes a lot of calm and composure to lose the ball in the corner, bring it back to your goal and finish it done. Chris Sutton commented on a little cry of joy, so you know it was good.
• A quick word for Ronaldo: a quiet night to the height of its ridiculous standards, but like Griezmann, high quality parts of high quality. He pulled a stop on Oblak's side and disguised a free kick shot back in the second half. He could still have a say in the meeting in Italy.
• Will you ever see a crazier yellow card than Diego Costa for crossing the wall unnecessarily? He is now out of the second leg. Idiot.
• Overall, Atletico has a well deserved victory and must be confident that they can go to Italy and defend this lead. If any side of the competition, it is them.
Tom, Devon, NUFC
When I visit a city for the first time, I do not look for fridge magnets or key rings to remember my trip. I am looking for the football shirt of this city.
Unlike many other United States, the first Spanish city I visited was Madrid and, of course, the opposite, that's what I am – Atletico became my team.
So last night, I encouraged them and what game was too.
It also reminded me why I wanted Simeone to succeed Wenger. The union of this team, these fans and all thanks to Diego. You had a penalty and a goal in chalk, but Atletico pushed and pushed until they finally broke through and added a second for good measure.
I would like to see Atletico win the trophy this season – it's long.
Graham Simons, Gooner, Norf London
Precious China
In recent years, we have seen many actors related to China, whether it makes sense or not. Many have made the change, with varying quality and results, and one thing in common: tons of money.
But could the balance be changing?
A few weeks ago, Wu Lei made his debut for Espanyol after signing for around 2 million euros. A 13-minute appearance against Villarreal is not usually extraordinary, but the match brought together 40 million viewers in China.
Now, Wu is a big name in China, with more than 340 appearances, 151 goals and 63 caps, but is it hard to see teams cramming a Chinese player?
If you need a spare wheel that will probably play 4 league games and a few cup matches, will you be looking for a medium-sized league player on which you will make waves in two years, or a Chinese player? who is actively earning more money than him? to bring?
It will be difficult if the quality does not correspond to what is needed, because without appearances, their value would not be great, but even some in the league could actively increase television revenues for everyone.
No doubt if it continues like this, the Wu Lei may be in demand this summer, whatever the performance
KC (was always inevitable)
[ad_2]
Source link
