[ad_1]
Manchester United made a mistake by offering Phil Jones a new four-year contract, according to Stuart Pearce.
United announced on Friday morning that Jones had extended his current conditions at Old Trafford, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer believing that Jones could play a key role for the club in the years to come.
But Pearce has questioned the duration of the new deal, given his dubious injury record, and believes that United is not going to get value for money.
"This season Jones has played 11 of the 25 games in the Premier League. Last season, he played 23 games out of 38, and the previous season, he played 18 out of 38, "he said at the Alan Brazil Sports breakfast on talkSPORT.
"These percentages represent about half or less than half of Man United's games.
"For me, what would be fair would be a two-year contract, but no more than that – not with the injury record I see in front of me.
"Having a player who is very good around the place, who has been at the club for a long time, knows the club and the structure of the club – I understand that.
"But a four-year contract is the gesture that I do not really understand.
"I'm not against Phil, I like Phil, when he plays and plays well, he's a good player and certainly deserves to wear the Manchester United jersey, no doubt.
"But four years? He is a utilitarian player who plays from time to time.
"He's not a James Milner, but a fit and available player for every game He said," Put me in and I'll do my best in any position ", and is always available for you .
The best Manchester United stories to date
Source link