Mueller report: the special council found no collusion

Mueller report: the special council found no collusion

Attorney General William Barr has released a redacted version of the report of special advocate Robert Mueller detailing the findings of the investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Earlier Thursday, Barr defended his conclusion, namely that there was no evidence of obstruction of justice by President Donald Trump.

The redacted report, which has nearly 400 pages, will summarize some details – but probably not all – explaining what the Mueller team uncovered during the 22-month investigation suspended as a cloud at Above the Trump presidency while the special advocate was investigating a possible collusion between Trump's team and Russia and any possible hindrance to justice.

At a press conference on Thursday morning, Barr said Mueller's report did not mention "collusion" between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

"After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas and hundreds of warrants and interviews with witnesses, the special advocate confirmed that the Russian government was supporting efforts to illegally hinder the 2016 presidential election, but had not concluded that the Trump campaign or other Americans conspired in these regimes, "Barr said.

Read also: Report Mueller: President Trump "has not conspired with Russia"

Mueller's investigation examined 10 episodes involving the president and a possible obstruction of justice, Barr said.

Mueller has not made a "traditional prosecutorial judgment" on the issue of obstruction, Barr said. Instead, Barr stated that he had concluded that the evidence was "not sufficient to establish that the President had committed an offense of obstruction of justice".

"The President did nothing that deprived the Special Council of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete its investigation," Barr said.

"Regardless of the fact that the acts were troublesome, this evidence of uncorrupted motives weighs heavily on any allegation that the president had intended to obstruct the investigation," he added. .

Barr said that the president's lawyers were allowed to read the redacted version of the report, but that the president would not claim the privilege of the executive.

To fight for full report

The Democrats have asked to see Mueller's full and unredacted report, accusing Barr of being relied upon to provide an accurate account of Mueller's findings as Trump's political proxy who had already been arguing against the merits of a case of obstruction against the president.

Congressional Democrats expressed their anger over Barr's decision to hold a press conference prior to the release of the report. Five House Democratic Committee presidents said Wednesday night in a joint statement that Barr would cancel the press conference and criticize Barr.

"The work of the special advocate being completed, it is now up to Congress to evaluate the findings and evidence and proceed accordingly," reads the joint statement.

House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer jointly called Mueller to testify publicly before Congress, saying that there was a "crisis of confidence" in the House of Commons. 39 Independence and impartiality of Barr.

"We believe that the only way to restore public confidence in the handling of the special council's investigation is for the Mueller Special Council itself to testify publicly in the House and Senate as soon as possible," he said. they declared.

Democrats were particularly suspicious that Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had made the decision not to have sufficient evidence to initiate such a prosecution, particularly in the light of reports that some members Mueller 's team reportedly told others that they were not satisfied with the investigation.

In a series of tweets on Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman, Jerry Nadler, asked why Barr was holding a press conference to explain the report, saying he was "deeply troubled by the information ", which had informed the White House of this report before its publication. , as reported by The New York Times. He also said that the Justice Ministry was "wrong" to delay the publication of the redacted report to Congress after Barr's press conference.

Congress will see Mueller's report and its conclusions a little bit more than the general public once the report is submitted to them.
Federal prosecutors said on Wednesday in a case-related case against Trump's Trump partner Roger Stone that there would be two versions of the special redacted lawyer's report, one for public publication and the other, less redacted, for a limited number of members of Congress.

Congressional Democrats have already authorized a subpoena for the full report and the underlying evidence, and have urged Barr to change course and provide an unredacted version. The subpoena is likely to go forward, which could trigger a legal battle between House Democrats and the Trump Government.

Barr announced Thursday that he would delete four types of information before making the report public: grand jury information, clbadified information, information about ongoing investigations and "information that would bring unduly violating privacy and the interests of third-party

Source: CNN