Pharma Bro, Martin Shkreli, will not let jail stop his Get-Rich-Quick antiques



[ad_1]

By CCN: Do you remember the man who thought it was a good idea to raise the price of an HIV drug by more than 5,000%? Whoever also thought it was a good idea to start a rap ox with the Wu-Tang clan? It's also the guy who tried to buy The life of Pablo for $ 15 million in bitcoin and claims to have spoken to Satoshi Nakamoto. That's right, the "pharma bro" Martin Shkreli is back. Well, not all the way home; he is still in prison after all. But he has a new plan to become considerably richer.

What is the latest company of Shkreli? He sued the employees of his former firm Retrophin. He complained on Friday against Stephen Aselage, Margaret Value-Jensen and Gary Lyons, accusing them of fraud. Shkreli's claim baderts that it was a conspiracy that "illegally ousted" him from the company he had founded.

The old Martin Shkreli

At one point in the lawsuit, Shkreli claimed to have "suffered significant harm" as a result of the actions of his former coworkers. It's rich from a guy who's in jail just for committing fraud himself. A jury found him guilty of defrauding investors in two of his bankruptcy hedge funds.

It was not the first time he went to jail because he managed to get locked up briefly for this clbadic waterfall:

Martin Shkreli is sentenced to prison after offering $ 5,000 to anyone who could grab a lock of Hillary Clinton's hair https://t.co/LGULXsQ0Hq pic.twitter.com/ZiyhU3wsk2

– CNN (@CNN) September 14, 2017

Whatever the case may be, Shkreli estimates that he is entitled to a product of over $ 30 million from other Retrophin employees. The lawsuit claims that the defendants "harvest[ed] what Mr. Shkreli sowed. He adds that the defendants:

"[H]little to do with the success of the company but rather motivated by their ego, jealousy and greed, [and] had achieved only one goal: to create and implement a program to oust Mr. Shkreli from the company for their own benefit. "

Since Mr. Shkreli's fame had earned him the price of an old drug of $ 10 to $ 750 per tablet and then blithely gone to national television to justify that action, he certainly knows what he's doing. it takes to be motivated by ego and greed.

His $ 30 million lawsuit may not be motivated by greed, but by another factor. Last year, Business Insider announced that the IRS and the State of New York were arguing for the right to claim the confiscated badets of Shkreli, including a painting by Picbado and the famous Wu-Tang clan album.

Regarding this album, the Wu-Tang clan has not forgotten Shkreli either:

Cl Clan Wu-Tang to Martin Shkreli: "Give us our album" ?

Watch the full interview ? https://t.co/HjxfAu1pZu pic.twitter.com/kitGLugCVx

– Mixmag (@Mixmag) May 22, 2019

What is the next step for Bro Pharma?

Shrkeli was sentenced to seven years in prison last year. It seems he will be able to come out much sooner than that with good behavior.

That said, his early release may have been a problem. He was transferred to a high security prison early in the year after being informed that he was using a contraband cell phone to run a pharmaceutical company while he was locked up. He also runs a personal prison blog covering everything from tips on biotech to poker strategy to sports betting. Unfortunately, the blog is currently suspended.

Finally, if Shkreli's project to raise funds through this lawsuit is unsuccessful, The Onion has a suggestion to make. He could exploit his pbadion for games and health care as follows:

"Fortnite" asks Martin Shkreli to organize a seminar at stake on how to drive up the price of medicines https://t.co/CLuGUxibKT pic.twitter.com/vuiFzcrvD8

– The onion (@TheOnion) May 30, 2019

In any case, do not sleep on Martin Shkreli. Once the pharma has made its triumphant return from prison, it will make another shot of brilliance. Whether he buys more famous works with bitcoin, hedge funds, or raises the price of essential drugs, with a maverick like Shkreli, you know that he will not stay long.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the article only commit the author and in no way represent those of NCC.

[ad_2]
Source link