[ad_1]
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may have made mistakes in the early days of their relationship that set the tone for their relationship with the media. A royal author thinks that they "got off to a bad start" and that it caused damage along the way.
The moment that changed everything
When Prince Harry and Markle started dating, the American actress was very interested and Harry stifled some negative comments before the media could hurt his new love.
The author of Prince Harry: the inner storyDuncan Larcombe believes that the couple may have "got off to a bad start," declaring to the LBC: "Many columnists have been quick to say" look, she's an actress, she's American, she has a million dancers. " followers on Instagram, she is not suitable.
He went on to note, "There was even the use of the word
"Exotic" in a column, which Harry took to heart. here is a
relationship with which he was very serious, and he just did not want
media review to destroy and make impossible. "
At the time, Prince Harry had issued a statement in which he defended Markle and asked the media to show more kindness, which Larcombe thinks sets the tone. He explained: "I think that from that moment on, he issued a very strong statement to the media saying" leave her alone, etc. " "I think it almost started badly."
Harry's statement, in part, noted: "Prince Harry is concerned for Mrs. Markle's safety and is deeply disappointed that he has not been able to protect her."
See this post on Instagram
This morning, the son of the Duke and Duchess of Susbad, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, was baptized in the private chapel of Windsor Castle during an intimate service chaired by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby. The Duke and Duchess of Susbad are so happy to share the joy of this day with members of the public who have been incredibly supportive since the birth of their son. They thank you for your kindness to welcome their firstborn and celebrate this special moment. Their Royal Highnesses feel lucky to have enjoyed this day with family and with Archie's godparents. Their son, Archie, was baptized by wearing the replica by hand of the royal baptismal gown worn by royal babies for 11 years. The original royal baptismal gown, made of fine Honiton lace lined with white satin, was commissioned by Queen Victoria in 1841 and was worn for the first time by her eldest daughter. It was then worn by generations of royal baptisms, including the Queen, her children and grandchildren, until 2004, when the Queen commissioned this replica by hand, to preserve the historic garment. fragile and perpetuate the tradition. Photo credit: Chris Allerton © ️SusbadRoyal
Prince William and Kate Middleton treated the media
differently
In comparison, Prince William and Kate Middleton were a
a little more welcoming in terms of media coverage. Larcombe said, "Fast
when William and Kate got engaged the day they got engaged
they organized a reception for journalists. "
He continued, "Of course, they did not want to do it but the point
did they make the effort to meet the journalists, for example "It's Kate," to talk to
she, meet her. "
As Larcombe said, Prince Harry was not always so concerned about privacy: "Harry always did that when you were on a royal tour with him, but on their engagement day the media was closed."
This limited interaction with the media continued, the
the author shared: "The day of their marriage, they were excluded. The day Archie
was born, they were not only excluded but slightly misled on what
come. Then, at baptism, we do not even have the right to know, the public
are not allowed to know who they have chosen as godparents, for the seventh
to the throne. "
Did this limited media exposure hurt?
Although the desire for privacy seems understandable given that the couple has a new baby, some experts believe that closing the media could be detrimental.
The editor of the Royal Daily Mirror, Russell Myers, remarked at the time the couple was organizing a private baptism for Archie that their relationship with the media was to be a "two-way street".
Myers told ITV Lorraine: "The fact that they went to do that and chose not to reveal the names of godparents, not to have the cameras to watch the comings and goings of those who were there. One could say that it is quite their prerogative.
He added, "It's a two-way street with the media. My personal opinion is when they make their charitable efforts, when they are touring, they welcome us with open arms.
He stressed, however, that "they must be aware that
are people who really appreciate them, love family and want
to see them enjoy the moments of celebration. "
[ad_2]
Source link
