Revision of episode 3 of the Line Of Duty series 5: the point of no return?



[ad_1]

This review contains spoilers.

It is there that zeal leads you – to a point of no return. John Corbett knows that he can not come out free, so in his eyes, he fights. Excited by a flawless sense of moral superiority over "bowed brbad" (now his slogan, not Ted's), Corbett burst into the home of an innocent woman with a hood and gun ready to commit serious harm so as not to be wrong.

If anything happens to Roisin, it will be destroy Ted Hastings. His beloved wife is in danger while receiving a friend in his single? Guilt! Why not take a rock hammer at Stone Henge and empty the Thames while you're there, John? The result would be the same. Hastings is a national building. To see it collapse would hurt us all.

That's why, speaking fluently to dramatic issues, Course of action continue pushing our man, sending demons like Moffatt and Bigelow in the desert to tempt him. "Did not we win a day in August?", They ask as they turn, their smiling faces looming on the screen. "Maybe it's time to take care of the ooooone number." "Credit facility against credit." Will Ted survive his forty days and forty nights?

Should we even care? Did not episode 3 confirm that Ted was dirtier than a magazine wrapped in a 1970s chain link fence? Oh, you have little faith. Hasting is not the only one to be tested in the five series; we are too.

Without having to slide the back of the shot with a top hat marked "H", this time did everything possible to make Ted look corrupt. He ordered raids that could spoil the ongoing investigation trails, seemed panicked in front of the picture of a man coming out of this brothel, looked scared near a laptop, had said laptop, ordered his team to respond to what had turned out to be a false Statute. call, do not answer a moment on the radio, was about the same height and construction as DCS Hargreaves … Damning, right?

No not necessarily. Of course, Ted seemed panicked. These are times of panic. And when it comes to scrapping laptops, what isolated man with the hotel's Wi-Fi has not regretted the strange search term after a few whiskeys (a single piece of ice). Especially with the CCP breathing in his neck.

Moreover, as was established last week, the 2972 ​​user can not be Ted Hastings because, unlike this user, Ted Hastings would know the correct spelling of "definitely" without spelling, fella. In his school years, they would probably have badped you less, and you would have been happy, my son.

No, Ted did not bend, but Course of action use it to play a game of moral buckaroo! for our entertainment. How much can a mule like Ted Hastings handle before leaving? If he suffered enough blows, could the miasma of corruption permeate even his thick skin? This drama has never dealt with moral absolutes. There has always been talk of people – not all good or bad – making mistakes that put them under geological pressure and observing how they behave. Poor Ted. The five series is not a thriller; it is an act of vandalism.

Of course, this episode was exciting, in the same way that having your eyes blindfolded and storing it in a moving van must be thrilling. Things were going very fast and hard, and it was hard to keep an idea of ​​every corner of the road, but you knew that it was absolutely vital to do it. Director John Strickland did a great job with a complex series of events in the Eastfield Raid taking place simultaneously in multiple locations. A less firm grip and we might all have been lost, but it created a sense of chaos and excitement without baffling us. (If you still have questions, maybe that can help.)

Corbett told Steve that the murder of Hargreaves left him no choice but to do things "in his own way". If that was really the case, why did he prepare his fake AC-12 ID card long before Steve – as he saw it – came across him? Corbett is like none of them. He needs to see himself as the good guy. Whatever course of action he takes, he justifies it as the only possible choice under the circumstances.

It's worthwhile for the Canape detectives among us to remember that Corbett's claim that a policeman manages BCG is just that – a notion. He twice admitted this episode by telling Steve: "As far as I know, there could be a copper curved at the top of the tree, pulling all the strings," and saying, "There is a crime organized running of course. Corbett is also certain that Hastings is corrupt. Do not make the same mistake.

Steve avoided an error this week by telling Kate the identity of his source CHIS (secret source of human intelligence, add it to your glossary), another example of the frantic pace of this show. Rather than letting slip its deception, it was over in a flash and we were on the next point.

The speed of the proceedings this year is almost comical. It took AC-12 a complete series to confess to a dishonest officer; between Malhotra, Maneet, Cafferty and Bloom, they've managed four in the last three weeks. If this success rate is maintained, in the 6 series, the great little girl Kate will only need to narrow her eyes in front of a DC waiting in the sandwich queue and they will admit everything.

Now that Hargreaves has been (literally) unmasked, who will be discovered next?

My vote? No matter who except Ted. Certainly.

Read here Louisa's account of the previous episode and our explanatory for the third episode.

[ad_2]
Source link