Royal family: why Prince Charles may not become King Charles III



[ad_1]

The art of naming a new royal baby is incredibly tricky, especially if that baby is destined to someday be king or queen.

Almost all royal names have at least one, if not more, links to previous royals. Whether it is William, George, Henry or Elizabeth, it is important that there are no overriding historical associations that will affect their future.

Many names have been tainted with bad luck and are unlikely to be used for a future ruler.

The best example is the name Richard. King Richard I (better known as Richard the Lionheart) was killed in action, the second was deposed, and Richard III is said to have killed his nephews at the Tower of London.

READ MORE: Royal family: Sarah Ferguson says Queen is more like a mother to her than her own mother was



Prince Charles, Prince of Wales seen during his meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi at Clarence House on October 22, 2020 in London, England.
Prince Charles has been heir apparent for 69 years

This idea also applies to the name Charles.

For such a popular name, it’s surprising that there were only two kings named after Charles, but to say they both had eventful reigns would be an understatement.

Charles I is best known for being overthrown by Oliver Cromwell after his defeat in the English Civil War in 1645.

He also had a bad personal reputation because he was a firm believer in the divine right of kings, which meant that he believed that his right to rule came from God and that he was not accountable to Parliament.



King Charles I was the first king to be beheaded

Charles I was imprisoned by Cromwell and beheaded in front of Whitehall Palace in 1649.

Charles I’s son, Charles II, was brought back from exile during the restoration of the monarchy in 1660 and was very popular.



The awesome new newsletter from MyLondon The 12 is packed with news, views, features and opinions from all over the city.

Each day we will send you a free email around noon with 12 stories to keep you entertained, informed and uplifted. It’s the perfect read for lunch.

The MyLondon team tells London stories to Londoners. Our 45 journalists cover all the news you need – from town hall to your local streets.

Never miss a moment by signing up for The 12 newsletter here.

But his reign was just as unhappy as that of his father because the Great Plague in 1665 and the Great Fire of London in 1666 took place during his reign.

For the past 69 years, the heir apparent to the throne has been Prince Charles. It is believed that he will one day become King Charles III, but he might choose to use a different reign name to avoid the same doom as his predecessors.



Prince Charles is the oldest Prince of Wales

As he will also follow the monarch to the longest reign in British history, Prince Charles will want to avoid any negative associations that may be made to him during his reign on the throne.

Several famous monarchs have already chosen to take a different kingdom name from their real name.

Queen Victoria was born as Princess Alexandrina but took the name Victoria because it was believed that Alexandrina sounded too foreign to be the name of a British Queen.



George VI unexpectedly became King after his brother’s abdication in 1936

The queen’s father also took on a different reign name. He was born as Prince Albert Frederick Arthur George on December 14, 1895.

On the abdication of his older brother, King Edward VIII, Prince Albert took the name George and became King George VI. He was seen as a demonstration of stability and a continuation of his father, King George V.

So, while Prince Charles is unlikely to change his name, given the confusion this would entail, it is entirely possible that he would choose to make himself known under a different name, such as King George VII. .

Do you think Prince Charles will choose a different name? Tell us in the comments!

Want more items like this? Sign up for FREE My London newsletters here .



[ad_2]
Source link