Social interventions under the presidency of Nana Addo | Characteristics



[ad_1]

The NDC was unable to register or categorically name a single social intervention that they had put in place under the chairmanship of HE John Dramani Mahama, when the Vice President, Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia, Disputed.

The pretense of not understanding the question, or better yet the flippant approach in which they were trying to answer, presented the image of a government that did not give priority to the interests of the people. The answers were at best laughable.

For the purposes of this article, we will examine what social intervention is and what Nana Addo did to facilitate the lives of the people of Ghana in the two years since she took office. The following is a simple and acceptable definition of social intervention: "an action that involves the intervention of a government or an organization in the social affairs of society". Bertrand Badré, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the World Bank in 2014, article of opinion: "The importance of infrastructure for economic growth, job creation and the development of jobs. access to markets and services, air and sea transport links to quality roads, telecommunications and energy production, is essential for the provision of reliable and business-driven services to develop and grow. "

It is important to note that the obligation of a state to provide a basic infrastructure can not be qualified as intervention. As a result, infrastructure becomes an important pillar of a country's existence and, in the ordinary course of events, governments must build their country's infrastructure to become the catalyst for progress and development.

The statement above clearly indicates why the NDC was unable to answer Dr. Bawumia's question. Finally, a response from Mr. Ofosu Ampofo, currently president of the NDC, that the extension of electricity to rural areas was a social intervention of the NDC, confirmed everyone's suspicions.

Social interventionism differs from the provision of social infrastructure and equipment such as toilets, electricity, schools, hospitals, water, roads, interchanges, among others.

At the micro level, it is up to the individual to take advantage of the infrastructure of a country. It is there that individuals are disowned because of the different levels of education, strengths, job opportunities and essentially their ability to make ends meet.

This is where social interventionism becomes an integral part of reducing the identified gaps in human development. When HE JA Kuffour took the reins of government in 2001 (the first mouthful of the NPP in the fourth republican derogation), the country has witnessed many notable social interventions, including GYEEDA, LEAP, Maternity, School feeding, etc., among the first interventions to be introduced by a NPP government. Ironically, the NPP had no interest in engaging in social interventionism, but the extent of poverty and low income levels and the risk to national security posed by the unemployment rate young people were of crucial importance for the implementation of the interventions. .

These interventions have brought tremendous benefits and relief to many Ghanaians. It should be noted that the NDC, which prides itself on being a social democrat, has canceled interventions such as free maternal care benefits, nurses and teachers, and inflicts many difficulties on poor, pregnant mothers. to students of institutions training schools.

Review of President Nana Akufo-Addo With already 2 years spent under the Nana Addo administration, the president reinstated all these interventions, with the exception of free maternal care, which was placed in the expanded program NHIS implemented to meet these needs. two more timely and meaningful social interventions in the form of Free SHS and NABCO.

Teachers 'and nurses' stipends sparked heated debate ahead of the 2016 elections. The NDC led by John Mahama canceled them in 2014. Nana Addo, aware that the cancellation was blocking Needed oxygen for trainees who had promised to restore them. The NDC ridiculed this idea and mocked this idea because it knew that the president, Nana Addo, would have no way of raising resources to restore compensation.

Needless to mention here that it is operational again. Before the implementation of Free SHS's flagship policy, the student registration rate in SHS was depressing, the number of children without access to secondary education was astronomical .

This meant that the country's future human resources were at risk. The following statement from the Minister of Finance at the 2018 budget presentation summarizes the gap between qualified students and enrollments; "Mr. President, allow me to say how much His Excellency the President is delighted that in 2018, 270,000 young Ghanaians (90,000 in 2017/2018 and 180,000 in 2018/2019) who would not have have been able to do so because of free SHS.We can not minimize the importance of building a future for all citizens of this country. "

More than 362,000 students have benefited from the FSHS for the first academic year at a cost of over £ 800 million. The second year saw a larger registration of 472,730 (years 1 and 2) and will cost 1.3 billion GHC. More than 270,000 students will stay at home, without the Free SHS policy. "The president has kept his promise to reinstate the compensation paid to teachers and the nurse training has been instructed to release funds to pay these benefits. As a result, the government has budgeted $ 252.2 million to pay nursing trainees in 2017 alone.

It is clear, therefore, that the Nana Addo nuclear power plant government has pursued the commendable need to protect the poorest members of society so that both ends of society find themselves better, while working hard to improve and change fundamental structures of the economy.

We believe this approach is more sustainable and superior to the Borrowing and Building approach of the NDC opposition party. While HE John Mahama reduces interventions, Nana Addo restores them, puts them in place and completes them.

The relief and tremendous benefits provided by Free SHS policy and trainee allowances characterized Nana Addo's presidency, a balanced approach to nation-building, a center-right party aware of the need to help the most vulnerable. of our society. These reasons, among many others, have forced Professionals for Change to support the NPP government and continue to do so. Clifford Bansah Chief, Research and Advocacy 0202010603

[ad_2]
Source link