[ad_1]
The Supreme Court has postponed indefinitely the question of whether two houses that the state wants to sell belonged to a businessman, Mr. Alfred Agbesi Woyome, or to the defunct UT bank.
The tribunal, presided over by a single judge, Judge Anthony A Benin, ruled on a re-examination request by Mr. Woyome.
Useful links Ghana Politics | Ghana celebrity news | News in Ghana
The businessman's lawyers filed a motion to overturn Judge Benin's decision by a panel of three members of the tribunal.
Given this request, the Benin judge decided to suspend the decision he was due to make on Monday.
properties
Ghana News Titles
For the latest news from Ghana, visit the Graphic Online titles page
Ghana news headlines.
Mr Woyome, the AG and the receivers of the defunct bank UT, MM. Vish Ashiagbor and Eric Nana Nipah, appear before the Supreme Court. The bank claimed ownership of both houses on the grounds that Mr. Woyome had sold the property to UT Bank. .
The state, on the other hand, seeks to prove that the properties are still for Mr. Woyome and that the defunct UT Bank, through its agents and Mr. Woyome, have agreed to prevent the sale of the two mansions so to compensate for some of the GH. .2 47.2 million that Mr. Woyome owes to the state.
Read also
Woyome Case: A-G and Anator Holdings vie for ownership of a career
A-G shows why Woyome owns the properties
A-G presents "evidence" of Woyome's property on properties
Twists
For news from Ghana | Ghana Business News | News in Ghana
The UT Bank, in April 2016, claimed ownership of the properties when the state attempted to auction them to cover the 51.2 million GH ¢ that the businessman was expected to l & # 39; State.
The Manet Towers branch of the current UT Bank claimed two residential properties in Trasacco, Accra.
At that time, lawyers UT Bank, Manet Towers, City Airport, Archer, Archer and Co., filed a notice of claim with the High Court for real property and served a notice on the property department. the G.
The effect of these claims is that the state can not sell these properties until there is evidence that the bank's claim is false.
Context
On July 29, 2014, the Supreme Court ordered Woyome to reimburse 51.2 million GHACs to the state on the grounds that he had obtained this money under unconstitutional and invalid contracts entered into between the government and the state. State and Waterville Holdings Limited in 2006 for the construction of stadiums for CAN 2008.
Woyome has appealed to the International Court of Arbitration to challenge the court's decision after having reneged on his promise to the Supreme Court to pay the money by the end of December 2015.
On March 1, 2016, Woyome asked the court to give him three years to pay back the money, but the court refused to grant him his wish.
In its 2014 reconsideration decision, the court found that the contracts on which Woyome had made and received the claim violated Article 181 (5) of Ghana's 1992 Constitution, which requires these contracts to be filed. before and approved by Parliament.
Source link
