[ad_1]
On Friday, July 19, Tesla's whistleblower Karl Hansen brought a lawsuit in Nevada against Elon Musk, the company and others for violating the Sarbanes Oxley Act, intentional interference in commercial relations and breach of contract .
Hansen, a former senior investigator with the Federal Maritime Commission, says that he continues to provide research badistance to former colleagues, which means that "the hell out of the whistleblower" could soon join " the hell of production "and" the hell of service "in Tesla's lexicon – not just in reference to retaliation allegations against whistleblowers, but in a flood of whistleblower claims against the company.
In response to comments, Mr. Hansen reported:
"It took a long time to get to this point and I remain steadfast regardless of the financial result. The only thing we are sure about wearing on our graves is our name. I have a career in integrity and I will not be idle in front of a person like Elon Musk who makes fun of others because he turns out to be a billionaire. "
Speaking of his experience in the ten months leading up to Friday's lawsuit, the member added:
"While this has been and continues to be one of the most heartbreaking experiences of my life, it's important that people do the right thing, even if it's done on their own. If you stay in the arena long enough, even alone, people will notice it, and the right people will notice your courage and support you. "
(In reference to the support, Hansen launched a GoFundMe campaign in June.The platform features in two other Tesla developments last week.The user of Twitter Skabooshka, against which Tesla dropped his request for Temporary restraining order Friday, had benefited from a GoFundMe Lora Kolodny also launched a GoFundMe campaign on July 15 on working conditions in Tesla's open-air badembly line – Maggie and Carlos Aranda -.
A Tesla representative was contacted for a comment late Friday but did not respond at the time of publication. If the company chooses to respond to TheDrive.com, its response will be included.
Problematic model
Among Hansen's claims, it appears from the trial that Elon Musk, through Tesla, forced his later employer to rebadign him and then eliminate his post, thus violating his employment contract (counts I and II).
At the risk of misinterpretation by a non-insider, the allegations would appear similar to statements made to the National Labor Relations Board in June on behalf of Tesla's employees in Buffalo that the company would have hampered former employees to find work. Business Insider cites the redacted lawsuit, in which the plaintiffs allege that Tesla "deliberately hindered efforts to seek employment from other employers in retaliation for the clear support of his union."
In Charge III, Hansen further baderts that the management of Musk and Tesla actively concealed reprehensible acts of conduct, including espionage – unlawful surveillance is also alleged in the above-mentioned Buffalo case – abusive contracts and robberies orchestrated by organized crime.
Paragraphs 16 to 19 of the prosecution identify flights ranging from $ 37 million to $ 150 million, as well as links to a Mexican drug cartel. (Pablo Escobar's brother recently claimed 100 million dollars worth of Tesla money or shares from Musk for allegedly stealing his idea of the flamethrower, but the Escobars are Colombian.)
In paragraph 22, Hansen alleges that a Tesla employee was fired after reporting theft of 13,000 dollars of copper wire to law enforcement, announcing Hansen's resignation from the company shortly after informing management of its findings regarding criminal activities (paragraph 23).
These cases of "dismissal of the messenger" are strangely similar to the claim of a former director of environment, health, safety and sustainability, responsible for Tesla, that they would have been fired after have reported security breaches. gay harbadment.
More recently, a lawsuit was filed in a Nevada district court in June in which the plaintiff, a former employee of Tesla, alleged that a badual badault had been perpetrated on the premises of the company. . that they escalated the problem in vain; and were then retaliated by their supervisors. The prosecution further alleged that after the plaintiff found Musk's personal phone number and sent a message explaining what had happened to them at the workplace, they were fired the next day.
Although Tesla provided answers to the above cases, the company had not yet responded to the June complaint. A representative of the company was contacted in mid-June for comments, but a week later he was informed of his editor's delay so that his response could wait. Follow-up messages were sent Monday and Wednesday of this week. (The publication of the Hansen trial on Friday subsequently changed the content, publication, and planned timeline of this planned article.) That said, it is understandable that Tesla's communications team is overwhelmed with media requests, given the vast interests of Elon Musk. and star power.
The whistleblower retaliation figured prominently in the case of Martin Tripp; Once Tesla identified him as the source of a Business Insider article, Tesla's security team told the police that she received an anonymous phone call announcing that Tripp was planning a mbad shootout in the Nevada factory where he had worked. That night, when the police confronted Tripp, in tears and unarmed, he expressed his terror with regard to Musk; they concluded that Tripp did not pose any threat, which means that he had been the victim of an "attack". Citing the Bloomberg article above,
"… as reported by police and former employees and documents produced by Tesla's own internal investigation, Musk undertook to destroy [Tripp]. "
Messenger's retaliation also followed an April investigation by the Reveal of Tesla's Center for Investigative Reporting on Occupational Safety, claiming that Tesla had suffered under-reported injuries, apparently to improve its safety statistics, which had been criticized. (As noted in paragraph seven of the article, Tesla did not answer Reveal's questions regarding the story.)
According to one of the sources of CIR, shortly after their investigations, a complaint against him was filed with the relevant medical commission and an anonymous call was made for the protection services of the childhood declare that they neglected their children and that they should be placed in the care of the children. State. The source said,
"I'm not sure if I know [what retaliation would come] that I would have made the same choice. I did not intend to risk everything in my life. I thought I could report it and that someone would stop what was happening to the workers. "
On their own, each allegation is undeniably disturbing. The collective picture that they describe is that of a culture where the bearers of bad news are banished. And with Musk himself, not a mere micro-manager but a nano-manager proud to proclaim himself, it becomes difficult to argue that the culture took shape without him taking notice, giving his consent or approving of the head.
An exponential ramp to brake
In light of Hansen's disclosures of investigations on behalf of other whistleblowers, it is likely that further prosecutions of this type will occur. Indeed, the last years have led to an exponential increase not only in automobile production, but also the number of legal deposits against Musk, Tesla and its solar division, formerly known as SolarCity. The table below, from mid-June, is from PlainSite.org.
It would be unfair to show Tesla's legal roles without also providing readers with a background on other automakers. Here are links to PlainSite.org's web pages containing legal file histories for Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Toyota Motor North America and Volkswagen AG, respectively.
At a glance, many recent deposits against Tesla appear to be unpaid guarantee claims or unpaid contractors. It can be hoped that – beyond "hell launchers" resulting from lawsuits based on Tesla's allegations of actions to date – future lawsuits may be limited to " simple "financial disputes such as these, or even more preferably settled before reaching the courts.
Tesla's employees, suppliers, customers and many supporters deserve nothing less than allowing the company to become an example of ESG (environmental, social, governance) principles. Even if such a trip may require a cultural revolution, the reward of pursuing "ESG paradise" would allow society to let its "hellish days" end.
Source link
