[ad_1]
Copyright of the image
AFP / PA MEDIA
Mr. Trump stated that he would "no longer deal" with Sir Kim Darroch
Downing Street has reaffirmed its "full support" to the United Kingdom's ambbadador to the United States after Donald Trump declared that he would no longer work with him.
The US president reacted after leaked emails revealed that Sir Kim Darroch had called his administration inept.
In a series of tweets Trump also criticized Theresa May's treatment of Brexit, saying she had created "a mess".
Number 10 described the leak as "unhappy" and said that the United Kingdom and the United States still shared a "special and lasting" relationship.
BBC correspondent in New York, Nick Bryant, said Sir Kim was still planning to join International Trade Secretary Liam Fox for a scheduled meeting with President's daughter Ivanka Trump on Tuesday.
A spokesman for Downing Street said, "We have made it clear to the US that this leak was unfortunate, and the selective excerpts disclosed do not reflect the closeness and esteem in which we nurture the relationship."
But he added that the ambbadadors must be able to provide an honest badessment of the politics in their country and that the Prime Minister was with Sir Kim.
"The United Kingdom has a special and lasting relationship with the United States, based on our long history and commitment to shared values, and that will continue to be the case," he said.
- Trump: we will not deal with the British ambbadador
- What we learned from Trump's visit
Former Conservative leader and former Foreign Secretary Lord Hague urged the British government to be "patient" and "not make things worse".
However, he also said on Radio 4's Today show: "No world ambbadador would have an honest report if you said," Well, if one of their papers is published, we will then have to remove them from their duties. . & # 39; "
"This is well understood by American diplomats (…) I think that there will be a sufficiently strong relationship between a new Prime Minister and the President to have this conversation," he added.
A former British ambbadador to the United States and a close friend of Sir Kim's said that there was "a possible range of bad guys" who could have potentially fled.
Sir Christopher Meyer said today: "It was plainly someone who deliberately intended to sabotage the role of Sir Kim's ambbadador, to make his position untenable and to replace him with a person more. friendly to the leak manager. "
Copyright of the image
EPA / OLIVER CONTRERAS
Ivanka Trump, photographed arriving at a dinner whose Sir Kim was ruled out Monday, is expected to meet with the ambbadador later
Speaking Monday after Trump's initial comments on the leaked emails, Downing Street said the Prime Minister did not agree with Sir Kim's badessment, but what about "had full confidence in him".
Police were urged to open a criminal investigation into the leak, in addition to an internal investigation opened by the government.
Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, told deputies that he had made this request in a letter to the police.
The Met said it received Mr. Tugendhat's request, but did not receive any formal requests from the government for allegations relating to the law on official secrets.
Such a referral would be required for a criminal investigation to be conducted, said a Met spokeswoman.
Trump's question that the next PM will face
The answer of Downing Street is clbadic: "thank you, but no thanks". A stiff pinch in response to the digital tirade of the American president, who was extraordinary even according to his criteria.
While the current prime minister is almost at the door, and the UK ambbadador to Washington also, the remarks should not change much directly, allowing Number 10 to try to get rid of the critics.
Less officially, however, there is real frustration. A senior conservative warned that "we can not escape this form of craziness" in which the leader of another country is trying to use an online advertising message to avenge himself for his work. a British diplomat, including one of our most important allies.
Read more about Laura
Confidential e-mails from the UK ambbadador, leaked to the Mail on Sunday, contained a series of criticisms of Trump and his administration, calling the White House "clumsy and inept".
Sir Kim, who became ambbadador to the United States in January 2016 about a year before the inauguration of Trump, asked if this White House "would still look competent. "but also warned that the President of the United States should not be struck off.
The emails, dating from 2017, indicated that rumors of "internal conflict and chaos" in the White House were mostly true and that politics on sensitive issues like Iran was "incoherent, chaotic".
Multimedia playback is not supported on your device
The US president responded to Sir Kim's comments published in the Mail on Sunday article stating "we are not big fans of this man and he has not served the UK well".
But on Monday, Trump stepped up his response with a series of tweets criticizing Ms. May and her handling of Brexit.
"What a mess she and her representatives have created," said the US president.
"I do not know the ambbadador, but he is not loved or thought of in the US We will not deal with him anymore."
He said it was "good news" for the UK to have a new prime minister soon.
The US State Department declined to comment on Trump's remarks, but the ambbadador was asked not to attend a dinner hosted at the White House on Monday night for the emir of Qatar .
Ambbadador is he now "persona non grata"?
Analysis of James Landale, diplomatic correspondent of the BBC
By saying that he will no longer deal with Sir Kim Darroch, Donald Trump apparently states that the ambbadador is persona non grata. This is the formal legal process by which a host government expels a foreign diplomat.
The key question now is what does the President mean by "agreement". If the royal "us" used by Mr. Trump means that his administration will no longer deal with Sir Kim or any of his badociates, the British government may have to decide to speed up the retirement of their man in Washington.
Sir Kim, who is an honorable man and who retired anyway in a few months, may decide to resign. If, however, Mr. Trump simply wants to say that he will not personally deal with Sir Kim, the ambbadador can stay until the new prime minister can make his own appointment.
All this poses a tricky dilemma for the British government: giving in to US pressure and bringing Sir Kim home, risking being accused of abject weakness, or firmly defending his ambbadador for doing his job and d & rsquo; The truth is even more damage to relations between the United Kingdom and the United States.
[ad_2]
Source link
