The answer for smokers against the anti-vaping agenda



[ad_1]

Image Credit: SmokeTastic.com

In the United States, many people still believe
this vaping is as harmful as smoking traditional cigarettes. This is mainly due
media and information released by the FDA. We will take a
a few minutes to look to see if vaping is really so bad and try to find the
evidence behind the statements.

January 30, New England
Journal of Medicine
published a one-year study to determine the effectiveness
electronic cigarettes were in comparison to conventional nicotine replacement therapies
(TRN) and products. The results are not surprising for people who already have
switched to e-cigarettes, but still very critical. 886 selected at random
smokers who wanted to stop smoking were divided into 2 groups, a group receiving a
Starter kit e-cigarette with 18 mg of e-liquid, the other group is seen to propose
a variety of pharmaceutical NRT treatments.

The results showed that only 9% of
group using traditional NRT treatments were able to quit, compared to 18%
who managed to quit smoking with vaping or e-cigarette products. It means that vaping
is twice as effective as traditional NRT products.

So with this proof, why more people do not use it
e-cigarettes to stop?

The big worry with a lot of smokers is that
Vaping is as serious as traditional smoking, so what is the purpose. C & # 39;
mainly because of the position of the media and governments on vaping.

If you were to search for news of vaping in
Regardless of the search engine, the amount of negative news you see is staggering. If it is
no news of more and more children's vaping, this is a new report where a
An electronic cigarette exploded and seriously injured a user.

The US government is very suspicious
on electronic cigarettes become popular too. They have a contract signed with all
the major tobacco companies that share the profits they make, and
therefore, the decrease in cigarette sales means less money for the individual
States. This agreement is known as Control
Settlement Agreement
. That said, as the popularity of vaping increases,
despite the lack of support from them, they are now trying to include
Electronic cigarettes in agreement, expect that their attitude changes quickly.

The change of direction

Things are starting to change. in December
2018 the
guardian
reported that Public Health England maintains that vaping is a
Huge 95% safer than traditional smoking. This was taken up by their
government and presented to the house, where they now follow this advice
and try to convince smokers that vaping is a better alternative.

In the United States, however, it's another story
Sadly. The FDA focuses primarily on the "The Real Cost" campaign, which
seeks to prevent children from vaping. This is a clever way of deflecting
the question and yet still provide a negative position to vaping. This keeps the
the government and big tobacco companies happy.

The different types of electronic cigarettes

As vaping has doubled in popularity each
year for the last 5 years, there are a lot of manufacturers releasing different
models for different types of vapers. It has become a bit of a minefield in
find the right electronic cigarette to meet your needs. Fortunately, there are sites for
help, Smoketastic has a big
section dedicated to helping different users to choose between these types, while
providing a wealth of information and criticism.

Back to the original study where vaping is
twice as effective as smoking we asked Nicholas King of Smoketastic's
comment:

"Although vaping is twice as effective as
any other product NRT, we think that if the public was better informed about the
different types of cigarettes and electronic liquids, the success rate would then be
even higher. At Smoketastic.com, we provide this knowledge gap to help you
more smokers stop and choose the perfect product. "

This brings an important point, if the
FDA and governments focused on the benefits of e-cigarettes and vaping,
and published better educational information about stopping smoking with
vaping, the country would be in a healthier state. But as individual states
are about to lose millions of dollars from the main settlement agreement, and the
Pharmaceutical companies (which sponsor most studies) lose their profits
With their TRN solutions and less unhealthy smokers, the wait can be long.

[ad_2]
Source link