The Brexit dream could fade



[ad_1]

British Prime Minister Theresa May met with the leader of the main opposition Labor party, Jeremy Corbyn, to seek a compromise to get his House of Commons legislator to approve his Brexit deal. Both sides said the meeting was "constructive" but "inconclusive".

If he agrees to bail May, Corbyn will ask the prime minister to concede some of his red lines on the Brexit. It's where things get interesting.

The workforce wants to create a permanent customs union with the EU, which would be considered a betrayal by many Conservative MPs in May.

A large number of colleagues from the Corbyn Labor Party also believe that he should be asking a heavy price for his support: a commitment made in May to hold a public "confirmation" vote on any agreement approved by Parliament. In simple terms, a second referendum.

It's where things get even more interesting. Holding a confirmation vote would require delaying Brexit. This would keep the UK in the EU beyond 12 April. This is important because the UK has the deadline to confirm whether or not it will participate in the European Parliament elections – something that all EU Member States are required to do.

A long delay, coupled with a commitment to a public vote, raises a very important question: would staying in the EU be an option?

Senior members of the Corbyn team are supportive. Earlier in the day, Emily Thornberry, Foreign Secretary of Labor, had written to her colleagues that "any agreement approved by Parliament must be the subject of a confirmatory public vote and that, yes, Another option of the ballot was to be "Tomorrow".

While Corbyn himself was shy in a second referendum, he is popular among his MPs and his grbadroots supporters. Supporting a public vote would be in line with the Schrodinger union's Brexit policy: this allows Corbyn to tell the Europhile members that he has kept the opportunity to stay in the EU on the table while engaging in an agreement on Brexit to please the voters of the Labor Party voted heavily to leave.

Of course, all of this could be hypothetical, as any extension of the Article 50 procedure – the legal mechanism facilitating Brexit – requires the agreement of all the other EU Member States of the 27 But if the EU summit last month has taught us anything, it is that the EU does not in any way want to be held responsible for a Brexit without agreement.

The political will to end a non-agreement is not limited to Europe. The mere fact that Theresa May made contact with the Labor Party makes it clear that she would prefer a gentler Brexit to a collapse without agreement.

Just last week, sources close to the prime minister claimed that she was preparing for a no deal. But the hard Brexiteers have never forgotten the support of May to remain in the referendum and surround themselves with allies who support it.

Opposition to the absence of agreement was laid bare at the Brexit closing of the day's action. Members of Parliament finally reached an agreement. The so-called Cooper Bill, named in honor of Labor MP Yvette Cooper, pbaded it, but was voted in the House of Commons, but by a single vote. The bill requires May to request an extension of the Article 50 process if she can not obtain approval of her agreement. Members should then have the power to extend the termination point of this application.

The government loses control of Brexit. In an attempt to cling to power, May has made huge concessions. This provoked a violent quarrel in his party. Most extremist members of the Brexiteer are conservatives. They see in the events of this week an act of treason on the part of the Prime Minister who lets the dream of Brexit dry up. The anger of his deputies is palpable. At the PM's Weekly Questions, May faced hostile retaliation from her own Conservatives.

Is a second referendum on Brexit inevitable?

Brexiteer Julian Lewis asked: "Why a Conservative Prime Minister who repeatedly tells us that an agreement is no better than a bad deal, now asks Labor MPs to obstruct WTO Brexit" while most Conservative MPs want us to leave the European Union for nine days? "Her colleague, Caroline Johnson, followed. "If we get to the point where we have the right balance between the risk of a Brexit without agreement and the risk of dropping the country and instituting an anti-Semitic Marxist government, in his view, that's". at that time, is the lowest risk, "she asked, referring to the crisis of anti-Semitism within the Labor Party.

The Conservatives are furious that their Prime Minister is selling them and handing over the keys of the country to a man who, in their opinion, represents a risk to national security.

But they can only have to blame themselves. As a Conservative MP, who always supported me, explained earlier: "Here is a group of people who, having voted three times the withdrawal agreement, complain that the Prime Minister is seeking to get a majority in Parliament. It's only a mistake, it's complete hypocrisy. "

[ad_2]
Source link