The cancer treatment target has not been reached for 1,000 days, as the NHS plans to abolish waiting time standards.



[ad_1]

In January, a quarter of cancer patients waited more than two months before starting treatment, a worrying increase which means that standard treatment has been forgotten for more than 1,000 days, experts said.

The official NHS figures for January and February show that performance against the main waiting times has continued to plunge into new depths despite a milder winter than last year.

The statistics come just days after NHS England announced its intention to abandon several targets after years of deterioration, despite fears of patients waiting even longer.


We will tell you what is true. You can form your own view.

Of
15p
$ 0.18
$ 0.18
$ 0.27
one day, more exclusive, badyzes and supplements.

The commitment to treat 85% of cancer patients within 62 days of referral is one of the few to be preserved, but has not been nationally delivered since December 2015 .

The January figures show the worst performance to date, with only 76.2% of them respected, against 81% in December.

left Created with Sketch.

right Created with Sketch.

1/6 Old people

"We recognize that there are pressures on the health service, there is still additional pressure on the NHS in the winter, but we have the additional pressures of the aging population and the increasingly complex needs of the population, "said Theresa May.

NHS Digital figures have more than doubled the expectations of older people over 12 hours in A & E among older people.

Getty

2/6 Patients who attend emergencies instead of seeing their GP

Jeremy Hunt called for an "honest discussion with the public about the reason for being A & E services," indicating that about a third of A & E patients were unnecessarily hospitalized.

Mr Hunt told the program "Radio 4 Today" that the NHS now had more doctors, nurses and funds than ever, but explained what he called "very serious problems in some hospitals "by suggesting that the pressures increase in part because people go in for consultation while they should not.
He urged patients to consult their general practitioner for non-emergency conditions, explained plans that family doctors have enough time to support the work of urgent care.

However, doctors in trouble following a generalist recruitment crisis said Hunt's plans were unrealistic and called on the government to commit to investing in all areas of overwhelmed health care.

Getty

3/6 Simon Stevens, head of the NHS in England

Reports that "key members" of Ms. May's team used internal meetings to accuse Simon Stevens, the NHS England director, of being unenthusiastic and unresponsive, were rejected by Downing Street.
Mr Stevens is reported to have rejected Ms May's claims that the NHS would have received more funds than necessary.

Getty Images

4/6 Previous health policy, no funding

In an interview with Sophy Ridge of Sky News, Ms. May acknowledged that the NHS was under pressure, but that it was a problem that had been "ducked by the government over the years."
She refuted the statement that hospitals would tackle a "humanitarian crisis" and said health financing was at record levels.
"We asked the NHS some time ago to define what it needed over the next five years to define its plan for the future and the funding it would need," said the Prime Minister.

"They did it, we gave them that funding, and in fact we gave them more funding than they needed … The funding is now at record levels for the NHS, more money has been invested. "

But doctors accused Ms. May of "denying" by explaining how the lack of additional funding for health care and social services was causing a vertiginous crisis in NHS hospitals.

Getty Images

5/6 Target to treat all A & E patients within four hours

Hunt was accused of diluting the flagship target of treating all A & E patients within four hours.

The Health Secretary told MEPs that the promise – introduced by Tony Blair's government in 2000 – should only target "those who really need it".

In the midst of mockery in the House of Commons, Mr. Hunt said that only four other countries were committed to treating all patients in the same time frame and that all had "less stringent" rules.

However, Ms. May said the government would respect the four-hour emergency target, which states that 95 percent of patients must be treated on time.

Getty Images

6/6 Nobody

Mr. Hunt was accused of "hiding" from the public following the announcement of the Red Cross comments and did not make an official statement for two days.

He was also filmed, refusing to answer questions from reporters who had sued him yesterday in the street to ask him if he was considering removing the four-hour goal scheduled for emergencies.
Sky News reporter Beth Rigby insisted the health secretary on her position on the subject, saying "the public will want to know, Mr. Hunt".

"Sorry, Beth, I've already answered questions about it," replied Mr. Hunt.

"But you did not answer the questions about it. You said that it was over-interpreted in the House of Commons and you did not want to dilute it. Is that what you say? "Said Mrs. Rigby.

"It's very difficult, because how are we going to explain to the public what your intention is when you change your position and you do not answer the question, Mr. Hunt." But the Health Secretary maintained his silence until he reached his car and climbed inside.

Getty


1/6 Old people

"We recognize that there are pressures on the health service, there is still additional pressure on the NHS in the winter, but we have the additional pressures of the aging population and the increasingly complex needs of the population, "said Theresa May.

NHS Digital figures have more than doubled the expectations of older people over 12 hours in A & E among older people.

Getty

2/6 Patients who attend emergencies instead of seeing their GP

Jeremy Hunt called for an "honest discussion with the public about the reason for being A & E services," indicating that about a third of A & E patients were unnecessarily hospitalized.

Mr Hunt told the program "Radio 4 Today" that the NHS now had more doctors, nurses and funds than ever, but explained what he called "very serious problems in some hospitals "by suggesting that the pressures increase in part because people go in for consultation while they should not.
He urged patients to consult their general practitioner for non-emergency conditions, explained plans that family doctors have enough time to support the work of urgent care.

However, doctors in trouble following a generalist recruitment crisis said Hunt's plans were unrealistic and called on the government to commit to investing in all areas of overwhelmed health care.

Getty

3/6 Simon Stevens, head of the NHS in England

Reports that "key members" of Ms. May's team used internal meetings to accuse Simon Stevens, the NHS England director, of being unenthusiastic and unresponsive, were rejected by Downing Street.
Mr Stevens is reported to have rejected Ms May's claims that the NHS would have received more funds than necessary.

Getty Images

4/6 Previous health policy, no funding

In an interview with Sophy Ridge of Sky News, Ms. May acknowledged that the NHS was under pressure, but that it was a problem that had been "ducked by the government over the years."
She refuted the statement that hospitals would tackle a "humanitarian crisis" and said health financing was at record levels.
"We asked the NHS some time ago to define what it needed over the next five years to define its plan for the future and the funding it would need," said the Prime Minister.

"They did it, we gave them that funding, and in fact we gave them more funding than they needed … The funding is now at record levels for the NHS, more money has been invested. "

But doctors accused Ms. May of "denying" by explaining how the lack of additional funding for health care and social services was causing a vertiginous crisis in NHS hospitals.

Getty Images


5/6 Target to treat all A & E patients within four hours

Hunt was accused of diluting the flagship target of treating all A & E patients in less than four hours.

The Health Secretary told MEPs that the promise – introduced by Tony Blair's government in 2000 – should only target "those who really need it".

In the midst of mockery in the House of Commons, Mr. Hunt said that only four other countries were committed to treating all patients in the same time frame and that all had "less stringent" rules.

However, Ms. May said the government would respect the four-hour emergency target, which states that 95 percent of patients must be treated on time.

Getty Images

6/6 Nobody

Mr. Hunt was accused of "hiding" from the public following the announcement of the Red Cross comments and did not make an official statement for two days.

He was also filmed, refusing to answer questions from reporters who had sued him yesterday in the street to ask him if he was considering removing the four-hour goal scheduled for emergencies.
Sky News reporter Beth Rigby insisted the health secretary on her position on the subject, saying "the public will want to know, Mr. Hunt".

"Sorry, Beth, I've already answered questions about it," replied Mr. Hunt.

"But you did not answer the questions about it. You said that it was over-interpreted in the House of Commons and you did not want to dilute it. Is that what you say? "Said Mrs. Rigby.

"It's very difficult, because how are we going to explain to the public what your intention is when you change your position and you do not answer the question, Mr. Hunt." But the Health Secretary maintained his silence until he reached his car and climbed inside.

Getty

"The hidden numbers hide real people who tell us how delays are a source of worry for them and their loved ones at a time when they are already trying to cope with the many worries about cancer," said Dr. Fran Woodward of Macmillan Cancer Support. .

More than 127,000 people have been waiting for cancer treatment for too long since the target was missed for the first time five years ago, she added.

This highlights the need for new cancer pledges and other wait times with funding and staff.

With more people than ever before in hospitals, the four-hour target in education support services and the 18-week waiting standard for operations have also seen performance deteriorate.

In February, only 84.2% of patients had been treated, admitted or sent home four hours after their arrival at the emergency – the lowest level since setting the goal in 2004.

More than 552,000 people waited more than 18 weeks in February for hip surgery or other operations, an increase of 100,000 over the previous year, and a wait of nine months or more has increased by almost 40%.

New objectives proposing to introduce an "average waiting time" for both measures and a standard of one hour for urgent situations in the field of efficiency and effectiveness. Expertise will be tested this year before the existing benchmarks are abandoned.

"Today's statistics will do little to dispel concerns on the front line that targets will not be changed on the basis of clinical consensus, but because of the political pressure of Conservative ministers" said Labor Secretary of Health Jonathan Ashworth.

He added that it was "shameful" that the cancer performance figures were the worst ever recorded.

Professor John Appleby, chief economist of the Nuffield Trust think-tank, said the latest cancer expectations showed a "brutal and worrisome" deterioration and that the so-called "pending waiting" for patients left for hours then that they needed a hospital bed were also rising.

The think tank supports pilots new standards of waiting time, but Professor Appleby said the NHS was in "rushing waters".

"It will be difficult for managers to implement them and for the public to trust that it is not just a matter of lowering the bar while the queues are going down. waiting continue to come out of the A & E door, "he added.

An NHS England spokesman said: "More people than ever before are coming forward for cancer screening tests, with a quarter of a million more people under cancer control this year and thousands more treated in this year. two months.

They added that the hard-working staff had allowed a quarter of a million more people to be seen in less than four hours at A & E, and had reduced ambulance delays and the number of people unnecessarily stranded. l & # 39; hospital.


We will tell you what is true. You can form your own view.

AT L & # 39; Independentno one tells us what to write. This is why, in the era of political lies and biases in Brexit, more and more readers are turning to an independent source. Subscribe from just 15p per day for additional exclusives, events and eBooks – all without advertising

Subscribe now

[ad_2]
Source link