[ad_1]
In recent weeks, Dennis Muilenburg, CEO of Boeing, and others, said that the actions of the pilots had played a role in the chain of events that caused the accidents, said Dennis Tajer, spokesman for the Allied Pilots Association, unfairly accusing the finger of being robbed on foreign pilots. .
"Shame on you … we will call you," Tajer said about Boeing on Thursday before the Federal Aviation Regulatory Authorities meeting convened by the Federal Aviation Administration in Fort Worth, Texas. "It's a poisoned and sick philosophy."
When asked if the Ethiopian crash could have been avoided if Boeing had followed up on the pilots' suggestions, Tajer said, "I think this conclusion is right."
Boeing did not respond to CNN's request for comment.
The pilots could not overcome the MCAS
Tajer, who flew the 737 MAX, says the Ethiopian Airlines pilots did what they were ordered to do, but Boeing's MCAS forced the aircraft to take an angle so aggressive that he could not recover.
"They had wired this thing to make it unrecoverable, and that completely shocked us," said Tajer.
The Boeing 737 MAX's MCAS software, designed to lower the nose of planes if it detects an imminent stall, would have played a role in the Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines collisions, which claimed the lives of 346 people. .
In April, Muilenburg stated that the safety systems of its 737 MAX jet were properly designed and that pilots were not "fully" following the procedures described by Boeing to avoid this kind of malfunction.
Ethiopian officials said the Ethiopian Airlines pilots had repeatedly executed all Boeing procedures, but could not recover the plane.
Recertification of the 737 MAX
Representatives of 33 international aviation authorities will meet with the FAA on Thursday to discuss the hotfix review process that Boeing has developed for the aircraft, which remains stuck around the world.
Despite the 737 MAX 's comprehensive review, FAA' s acting administrator, Dan Elwell, dismissed on Wednesday the idea that collisions involving the plane had shaken the trust between the two. foreign regulators and the FAA.
He added that the FAA remained "in constant and close communication" with other regulators and that, while waiting for the United States to lift the flight restrictions first, expressed optimism about the willingness of foreign regulators to agree on the recertification processes of the aircraft.
"Of course, the idea is that, overall, we are working from the same partition, it is this partition that gathers the technical data and processes that we use to bring back the 737 MAX," he said. .
The process was not as fast as Boeing had originally planned. Elwell said the process was delayed by a review by the manufacturer and questions from the FAA.
Elwell does not predict a schedule for Boeing's hotfix certification. When asked if the airline's plans to put the 737 MAX back into service in August were realistic, he responded that he would not even say October at this point because of the unknowns badociated with this hotfix .
Prior to recertification, the FAA must receive Boeing's final request prior to conducting test flights, a system safety badysis and determination of training requirements.
International regulators, including those in Canada and Europe, will conduct their own independent validations or design reviews of the updated aircraft system before lifting the flight restrictions.
A spokesman for Boeing said in a statement on Wednesday that the company was working closely with the FAA and global regulators on processes to certify MAX's updated software and improve pilot training.
"Safety is our common priority and Boeing continues to fully support airline customers and regulators around the world," the spokesman said.
Patricia DiCarlo and Madeline Holcombe of CNN contributed to this report.
[ad_2]Source link
