The United States is supported by private sector activity, while China’s strong capabilities are hampered by limited transparency and a lack of commercialization



[ad_1]

High-level results of Futron's 2010 Space Technology Capacity Index

High-level results of Futron’s 2010 Space Technology Capacity Index

“The management of technological development at the national level must integrate the source of technological development as well as the way in which products and services are disseminated in a globalized and commercial space industry. – Peggy Slye, COO, Futron Corporation

The release of Futron’s 2010 Space Technology Capacity Index represents an important step in integrating the capacity and use of technology into national space competitiveness. According to Ms. Peggy Slye, Chief Operating Officer of Futron, “Managing technology development at the national level requires an understanding of the technical requirements of space programs, but also, increasingly, must integrate the source of technological development as well as the how products and services are disseminated in a globalized and commercial space industry. For example, the Technology Index finds that the technological leadership of the United States is supported by the contribution of the industrial sector, which effectively markets, uses and sells technology assets to governments and commercial customers around the world. Canada is another country that effectively disseminates its technology.

“Canada is overcoming some of the country’s technological limitations by focusing strong policy and government support on specific space activities that maximize the country’s space competitiveness. By focusing on robotics and the activity of the ISS, Canadian technology is playing a leading role that extends beyond its core capabilities, ”said Mr. Jay Gullish, a senior manager of the ISS. Futron program. The assessment, conversely, indicates that China is not effectively exploiting its capacity for achieving high-tech space, in part due to the government’s trade policy and limited industrial activity by the private sector. Ms. Alyssa Mueller, Head of Technology Management at Futron, says: “Assessing the availability and maturity of key technology is critical to a country’s success in the space environment. The Technology Index produces a ranking not only of technological disciplines, but also of a country’s ability to fully integrate these areas into national missions and international projects. As part of Futron’s annual Space Competitiveness Index, Futron’s technological capability assessment provides a benchmark against which decision-makers can manage and use national technology assets.

The Technology Index was developed as a method of analyzing the capacity levels of space technology as an overall component of space competitiveness. It compares the 10 nations included in Futron’s SCI, ranking them on the basis of their demonstrated achievements in space technology against one another, then placing those achievements in the context of the science and technology environment (S&T ) underlying or supporting that relates to the overall spatial competitiveness. By assessing capabilities in key technological areas, which enable a country to explore and exploit the space environment, the Technology Index produces a ranking of countries on the basis of which the most competitive national space technology company is demonstrated.

About the technology index

The Futron Space Technology Capability Index (Technology Index) is a complement to the Futron 2010 Space Competitiveness Index (SCI) and is provided as part of the larger report. The 100-plus-page report, in its third year, assesses nations across 50 individual measures to rank the 10 countries currently leading in space competitiveness. The Space Technology Capability Index is based on a set of internationally comparable measures, both qualitative and quantitative. The measurements are integrated into a quantitative model which makes it possible to identify and assess the national strengths and weaknesses of space technology capabilities and the ability to exploit this technology as an element of space competitiveness. For more information on purchasing, please visit http://www.futron.com/SCI_2010.xml.

Click here for the Executive Summary of the Space Technology Capacity Index

About Futron

Futron Corporation is a leading provider of decision management solutions for aviation, defense, telecommunications, space and other technology companies. The company combines business, technical and managerial expertise to create solutions aimed at improving decisions, performance and results. Business and market management, safety and risk management, and Futron program and technology management products and services are recognized and accepted as industry standards and are influential in government forums, commercial and international. We are thought leaders responsible for innovations in the field, including methodologies, tools and solutions. Futron’s skilled and talented professionals work with clients to resolve diverse and challenging strategic and tactical issues and opportunities. Our innovative decision management solutions are at work in governmental, commercial and international aerospace companies, consistently producing better decisions and a better future for customers.

Futron has developed a set of benchmarking and spatial competitiveness services to provide executives with robust analytical tools to support and inform strategic planning and decision-making – two essential elements necessary to maintain long-term competitiveness. Futron’s spatial benchmarking and competitiveness services provide decision-makers with the quantitative foundation to effectively manage and monitor government and industry performance within the space industry. Futron’s factual spatial statistics provide the information needed to create business plans, justify business investments, and determine policy. By combining over 50 industry datasets, Futron can help you compare your current market position and track changes over time:

  • Establish a current baseline to inform aerospace policy development and strategic business planning
  • Identify current strengths and weaknesses as a way to identify opportunities and mitigate threats
  • Provide insight into the current value of space activity and define strategies to create national or organizational benefits
  • Help define, quantify and validate objectives by linking policy to results
  • Identify best practices to highlight relationships between metrics and success
  • Provide a framework for the projection and evaluation of strategic alternatives

# # #

Share the article on social media or by email:

[ad_2]
Source link