[ad_1]
Flood criticized Mueller's approach as part of the investigation for obstruction, stating that "the special counsel and his badociates failed in their duty to act as prosecutors and only as a prosecutors ".
Even though the current directives of the Department of Justice state that a president in office can not be charged, Flood wrote that Mueller had to "ask the grand jury to make an indictment or refuse to wear the card." 39, court case ".
"The (special counsel) has instead produced an interesting document on both the" truth commission "report and the written exam at the law school," wrote Flood.
"Far more detailed than the text of an indictment or a known conviction, the report is loaded with factual information that has never made it known." subject to conflicting tests or independent badysis, "he added.
The letter is dated April 19, a day after the Department of Justice released the redacted report.
In the report, Mueller directly explained how the decisions of the Department of Internal Justice against the impeachment of a president had had a major impact on his internal deliberations. In fact, Mueller based his investigation on any obstruction on the idea that he could not bring a complaint against Trump, even though he found irrefutable evidence against him, but wanted to preserve the evidence and included references to the unique constitutional role Congress to detain a president. responsible.
Mueller explained in his report that he partly considered that this effort preserved the details because the president "does not enjoy immunity after his departure" and that his team "conducted a thorough factual investigation to to preserve the evidence when the memories were fresh and documented "the materials were available. "
Another part of the letter explains the White House's argument that Mueller would have overstepped his role by providing a "roadmap" that Congress could use to initiate impeachment proceedings. Mueller never said that directly in his report, but some Democrats and commentators said the report could give Congress what it needs to take the next steps against Trump.
"Under a separate power of attorney, officials of the Department of Justice should not create" roadmaps "for the purpose of forwarding them to (congressional) committees," wrote Flood.
The letter criticizes Mueller's decision to document nearly 200 pages of extraordinary detail from his investigation of obstruction. The Department of Justice regulations require Mueller to submit a "confidential report" to the Attorney General explaining the decision not to prosecute the persons under investigation. The regulations do not impose any limit on the length or the details of the report.
Essentially, the White House letter states that Mueller's team was doing politics when they specifically stated in the report that she "does not exonerate" Trump from the impediment to Justice.
"The reverse evidence statements and" exonerations "of the (special advisor) can only be understood as political statements by people (federal prosecutors) who, in our system of government, are legitimately supposed to never be political in the future. 39, performing their duties, "Flood said, echoing Trump's long-standing position that Mueller's team is biased.
The letter also states that the White House wishes to preserve all the privileges of the executive power for all future proceedings. The fact that the chair has not baderted the privilege of the report does not mean that he will not do so in the future. Flood also aimed to distinguish between cooperating in a criminal investigation and a congressional inquiry led by House Democrats.
"The President wants the following characteristics of his decision to be known and understood," Flood wrote. "His decision not to claim privilege does not constitute a waiver of that privilege for any other document or for any other purpose."
CORRECTION: This story has been updated to accurately reflect the date of Trump's tweet.
[ad_2]
Source link
