Theresa May asks the EU to postpone the Brexit to June 30 | Policy



[ad_1]

Theresa May wrote to the EU asking Brexit for a brief deadline until the end of June, informing MPs that a longer deadline would mean "a failure as a result" of the result of the 2016 referendum.

Speaking at the beginning of the Prime Minister's questions, Ms. May said, "I am not prepared to postpone the Brexit of June 30", hinting that she could withdraw rather than leave a long delay on Article 50.

The Premier said she would present her plan for Brexit in the House of Commons for the third time. If the time was up, the delay would allow it to be implemented. If the country is defeated again, Parliament should decide what to do, said May.

While she was speaking, No. 10 published the text of her letter to Donald Tusk, President of the European Council, formally asking for the deadline, saying only that time would allow her to ask the House of Commons again for her plan.

The letter indicated that May had planned to bring her agreement back to the House of Commons this week for a third vote, but did not specify what would happen if the vote was lost.

This announcement provoked angry scenes in the married quarters, Jeremy Corbyn accusing May of having "no plans" and embarking on a reckless race.

"We are currently in a national crisis," said the leader of the Labor Party. "The incompetence, the failures and the intransigence of the Prime Minister and his government have brought us to this point."


SNP's Pete Wishart asked the PMQs at the beginning to clarify their plans. She said she did not want to extend the Brexit beyond a time when the UK should hold new parliamentary elections in May.

"I do not believe that such elections would be in anyone's interest," she told the House of Commons. "The idea that three years after the vote to leave the EU would require the citizens of this country to elect a new group of MEPs is, in my opinion, unacceptable. it would be a failure to act on the referendum decision that this House is committed to honor. "

She added that she had written to Tusk to request extension, adding, "The government intends to submit proposals for a third meaningful vote.

"If this vote is pbaded, the extension will give the house time to consider the bill on the withdrawal agreement. Otherwise, the house will have to decide how to proceed. But as Prime Minister, I am not ready to postpone the Brexit of June 30th. "

After the family housing, May's spokesperson was repeatedly asked if this meant she was resigning instead of allowing a longer period, which he declined to comment on.

Corbyn told May that her plan had been rejected twice decisively and that she "was pursuing her efforts with an unfeasible and unsupported agreement". "Surely after two big refusals from the house, she surely noticed that she did not have much support for the deal she had negotiated?"

He asked the Prime Minister: "She told the House that the EU would only allow an extension of Article 50 if its purpose was clear. She will travel to Brussels tomorrow morning to meet the European leaders. What is his clear purpose?

May did not respond, but instead accused deputies of complacently delaying the Brexit process, causing cries of protest in the House of Commons.

"The result of a long extension would be endless hours and days on the part of this badembly, continuing to reflect on his navel on Europe and not to solve the problems that matter to our voters", she said.

"This house has been too long let go to Europe. It is time for this badembly to decide that it will hold Brexit for the benefit of the British people. That's what the British deserve – they deserve better than what this house has given them so far. "

Other MPs also expressed concern about the May Action Plan. Yvette Cooper, the Labor MP who chairs the Home Affairs Committee, said the Prime Minister's only plan was to ask people to support "the same plan she has presented to the House twice, and which has been completely rejected twice ".

Cooper said, "Why does not she just open up, think again, allow indicative votes proposed by others? Because what she does by sticking to this failed plan is extremely dangerous for our country. In the national interest, I ask this Prime Minister to think again. "

[ad_2]
Source link