Trump tries to storm Putin – but evolving positions test credulity



[ad_1]

Under intense political pressure, the president went further in the Russian leader's responsibility for the cyber espionage attack on the 2016 election than in an interview with "CBS Evening News" on Wednesday.

Putin personally suggests that the political storm is raging is likely to intensify after accepting the Russian leader's version of the facts about the badessments of his own intelligence services at a press conference through the world.

I would go no further than this indirect charge of the Russian leader when Glor asked if Putin was telling the truth when he did what the President described as "extremely strong and powerful denials" d & # 39; involvement.

"I do not want I can only say that I trust our intelligence agencies as they are now constituted," Trump told Glor

. He blasted President Barack Obama, former leaders of the intelligence community and media for peddling "false news", but Trump refused to denounce Putin unequivocally.His reticence corresponds to a pattern in which he has long been anxious about Putin and hesitated to criticize him His hesitation will only add to the growing questions – which have been whispered in Washington but are now openly discussed – about whether the Russian government really has compromising information about Trump.

Trump said that he was very strong in private with the Russian leader, saying "we can not have that", referring to future electoral interference.

On this p Anointed, America will have to speak to Trump because he refused to even deliver this message in public to Putin during their news conference, in which he instead threw the US intelligence agencies under the bus.

A Presidency Still Stuck in Helsinki

The Trump interview comes another day of head reversals, ambiguous badertions and punches. The clean-up efforts of the White House only exacerbated the mystery of what had happened during his in-camera meeting with Putin in the Finnish capital on Monday

. The Trump presidency is still stuck in Helsinki, and the more the White House tries to get out of the mess, the deeper it gets

The president plunged into a new controversy on Wednesday when he was asked by a journalist Russia was already playing with the 2018 elections in mid-term, after National Intelligence Director Dan Coats said last week that "the lights are blinking red again."

Once again, the president triggered a media frenzy after apparently repudiating Coats humiliated and after having preferred Putin's word to the nation's highest spy at his press conference in Helsinki

. A few hours later, with the latest in a series of increasingly inventive rationalizations, but hard to believe, for Trump's comments.

"The president was saying no to answering the questions," said Sanders. possible that in the hubbub of a press availability, Trump did so – yet his decision to continue answering questions seemed to undermine Sanders' explanation.

And the video tape of the moment Trump showed the question

Month after month of obfuscation and the creation of alternative realities by the White House mean that the administration has squandered the benefit of the doubt.

The best scenario that can be drawn from the last few years is that Trump has trouble expressing what he really thinks. The worst case is that it reveals his sincere convictions – but his White House is trying to reframe them for political reasons. One or the other scenario is embarrbading, because rhetorical precision can be crucial for presidents in times of crisis, when words really matter.

The sloppy demotion days

were viewed with greater skepticism. He insisted that he was misquoted when he told Putin that he saw no reason for it to be "Russia that hacked the US elections".

he meant "would not" instead of "would", a version of the events that caused derision on social media and skepticism in Washington.

In the same media appearance, Trump read from a reconstructed written statement after the crisis Meetings were held between his aides about the reaction against the president's press conference in Finland.

At one point, he said that he agreed that Russia should intervene in the elections, others could have been involved.

The seeming ad-lib was just the last sign of how Trump tends to say what he really wants to stay when he's off script, and that's a reason for which many people tend to overlook media appearances, like the CBS interview Wednesday.

It's a measure of the shock and dismay that continue to prevail in Washington after his performance in Finland that, for once, Trump finds himself in the impossibility of changing the subject

. The president is a master of the diversion, to throw the smoke on a mistake by causing a new political or cultural outrage or simply surfing on the wave of chaos that he has brewed while the rest of Washington is drowned in his response to the controversy. The president tried to spark a new, more profitable outcry Wednesday night, returning to a theme that has been a reliable lightning rod in the past.

"The two biggest opponents of the ICE in America today are the Democratic Party and MS -13!" Trump tweeted, although his inflammatory rhetoric failed to break saturation coverage on Russia.

If history is a guide, all the controversy in Washington on Trump and Russia will not hurt him with his faithful political base. The president can also be isolated by his relentless attacks on the credibility of US intelligence agencies over the Russian drama and the "witch hunt," he says. is led by special advocate Robert Mueller

But Democrats believe that they can turn the frantic race of the White House into an election issue that could appeal to independents and increase their turnout in November [19659005]. Honestly, it does not appear that the President has pledged to protect the United States from Russian interference, "said Joaquin Castro, a Texas Democrat, to Wolf Bli, of CNN. room of situation. "

[ad_2]
Source link