[ad_1]
The new Epic Game Store has been the subject of criticism, but it is he who can compete with the industry from the point of view of a former employee of the competition. Because the previous dog, Steam by Valve, had caused some problems with its quasi-monopoly position.
Richard Geldreichwho used to work at Valve, does not see in Epic the problem that some users describe as a company because of their new game store and other things. And certainly not Epic is the death of the PC game. After all, the platform is replaceable and if Epic had not come, someone else would have built an effective competition with Steam. After all, it was urgent.
"Steam has killed PC gaming and imposed a 30% tax on the entire industry," said Geldreich, referring to the commission's revenue generated by the platform. And since Steam was there first, almost all the games have been sucked up and finally no one has gone past the platform, Valve suddenly had a money-printing machine in the house, which had also ended up tweaking the society.
Steam would be a profitable single figure
In the beginning, the 30% was also in order – because even 50% of retail sales were dropped. After all, Valve has come up with a good online sales, billing and service system. However, the platform is no longer developed and, according to Geldreich, Valve has become so lazy and greedy in the long run.
Epic, however, entered the race with an aggressive share of 12%. And according to Geldreich, Valve would not break a jag of the crown if one also pbaded to this commission. Because from his point of view, with insider knowledge, Steam would have been profitable even with a one-digit share. With 12%, we still earn enough and the game makers have more money for their own work.
Shop, Epic Games, Platform, Epic, Epic Games Store, Game Shop
Epic Games
2019-04-09T16: 47: 00 + 02: 002019-04-09T16: 47: 00 + 02: 00Christian Kahle
[ad_2]
Source link
