Why Chelsea hangs up to dry the treatment of managers turned to vinegar with the ransacking of Antonio Conte



[ad_1]

The recent history of Chelsea's managerial achievements has gained momentum. Unfortunately, the recent history of managerial layoffs at Stamford Bridge has simultaneously become an increasingly uncomfortable situation.

Jose Mourinho, who won the League Cup and the Premier League title in his first season in 2005, has retained the 2006 title, won the League Cup and FA Cup in 2007, and is party in September 2007 "by mutual consent", amid rumors of unrest between Mourinho and club owner Roman Abramovich.

Carlo Ancelotti was named in 2009 The title of the league and the FA Cup in May 2010 during the first season in charge, and sacked in May 2011.

Roberto Di Matteo entered as acting director in March 2012, won the FA Cup and the Champions League in May, was appointed permanent manager in June, and sacked in November 2012.

Jose Mourinho quickly returned in 2013, won the League Cup title and of the Premier League in May 2015, but leaves again in December 2015 "by mutual consent."

Antonio Conte was nominated in the summer of 2016, won the Premier League title in May 2017 in his first season, won the FA Cup in May 2018, but was sacked two months later [19659007] In the early years of Roman Abramovich's reign as Chelsea's conquering owner, overseeing a new period of unprecedented success at Stamford Bridge, the Russian brutality with which he managed the club's managerial situation was seen as a sign of a new era. implacable ambition.

A new era and a much desired obsession On sentimentality, this strict and uncompromising mentality has defined a new phase of English football.

More than a decade later, the cold, calculated and relentless regime of what became a revolving door at Stamford Bridge began to wear out. At best, it has become a little complicated. At worst, with the recent dismissal of Antonio Conte, he turned to vinegar.

In May, Arsène Wenger's departure from Arsenal was announced towards the final stages of the 2017/18 campaign. Gary Neville, through the Sun, called the club's process a "good mess".

Chris Brunskill Ltd. / GettyImages

Neville said about the process of finding Wenger's replacement: "I am shocked by the process that has unfolded since [the announcement of Wenger’s departure].

"Arsenal makes a good mess of what has happened since, they are everywhere."

Chelsea, meanwhile, has been the subject of intense speculation regarding their managerial position. All indications, especially after the FA Cup final victory in May, seemed to be that Antonio Conte would not continue at Stamford Bridge for the 2018/1919 season.

The club signed Jorginho this summer, but the seeming managerial uncertainty has clearly affected such a procedure.

On July 13, less than a month before the upcoming opening of the Premier League campaign, Chelsea announced that they had separated from Antonio Conte.

By the time of the announcement, Conte had already led his Chelsea players back to pre-season training. A few days after the return of the Italian before the new season, Chelsea 's board of directors sacked his manager.

Arsenal's process to find a new manager and successfully find a first candidate to replace Arsene Wenger after 22 years at the head and in motion by the time their London counterparts had announced the departure of Conte.

If the operation of Arsenal was indeed a "good mess", then under Abramovich of Chelsea was quite shambolic.

Aside from the lethargic and reckless process implications had directly on the club, it was also perhaps the clearest case so far of the lack of decency and respect of the Chelsea Board of Directors when it comes to managing their managers.

is part of Antonio Conte in Chelsea since the early stages of the 2017/18 season. After Diego Costa and Nemanja Matic were sold out of control last summer and inadequately replaced by Alvaro Morata and Tiemoue Bakayoko, the Italian was obviously more comfortable in his position.

A manager of lesser character resigned in the circumstances. no more undermining his control on his own side of those above him at the club. But Conte is made of harsher material, and the Italian has struggled.

Inevitably, the negative influence of out-of-field problems had a significant impact on the field results, while the reigning Conte champions were almost in fifth place finish, while claiming a triumph of the FA Cup to close the campaign.

The most unfair aspects of the Conte situation were mainly the total lack of responsibility on the part of the Chelsea board of directors and its underperforming players. It was Abramovich and his teammates who made the decision to sell Nemanja Matic, a key component on the Conte side, to a national rival of Manchester United, and replace him with the incompetent Bakayoko

. Is Diego Costa who threw his toys the pram, despite Conté's confidence in the striker, and forced his move away from the club, while Eden Hazard and Thibaut Courtois have flirted sporadically over the past year with the notion of relocations to Real Mad

Despite Conte's best efforts to maintain his leadership that had guided his team to a Premier League triumph in his first season, it was the players and players of his club who they finally let it go.

Inevitably, as this has become the model of "success" at Stamford Bridge over the last decade, it is the manager who has paid the ultimate price.

It was disclosed to Sky Sports that the Tale Bag had been the result of his "alienation of several players and a total breakdown of communication with the club's board of directors".

The fact that Chelsea had the opportunity to sack his manager and point the finger at the head of the team, but it's no longer as silly or convincing as the the legitimacy of those who, in the large armchairs, drag their directors to dry so far-fetched.

[ad_2]
Source link