[ad_1]
As Harry prepares to become a father himself, however, he and Meghan, the Duchess of Susbad, do not plan to expose their son or newborn daughter to the light of the world's press of the same way.
Harry and Meghan broke with the modern convention by choosing to keep all the details of the new arrival confidential. We do not even know where the birth will be, whether in the hospital or at home.
In a statement released on April 11, the couple said he "was anxious to share this exciting news with everyone once he'd had the opportunity to privately celebrate his new family." ".
We will be informed when the Duchess is put to work and once the baby is born. Then, when the couple is ready, a small group of journalists, photographers and film crews will be invited to capture the first pictures of the new family.
As in many other areas, Harry and Meghan do it in their own way, but their decision to avoid a large-scale public "unveiling" for baby as soon as possible has become a topic of discussion in itself.
"Every inch the princess"
Meghan's sister-in-law, Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge, chose to present her three babies to media around the world on the steps of the Lindo Wing shortly after their arrival.
"She watched every inch of the princess," Emily Nash, editor-in-chief of British magazine Hello! "She looked like a royal on a royal engagement and, as a mother myself, I found it slightly incredible that she looked so cool," Nash added. , who was among the many journalists who were waiting for the Duchess outside the hospital.
Kate's glamorous look attracted criticism and flattery. The actress Keira Knightley criticized the duchess in a 2018 essay for the book "Feminists do not wear pink and other lies". Knightley explained that Kate set unrealistic expectations of other women with her immaculate postpartum appearance.
Referring to the birth of Princess Charlotte in 2015, Knightley wrote, "She was out of the hospital seven hours later with her face made up and her high heels, the face the world wants to see. Do not stay here with your daughter and get shot by a group of male photographers. "
Others claimed that Kate was simply fulfilling her motherly duty of future heirs to the British throne.
"We must remember that Catherine will be the queen consort in the time that pbades," Bonnie Greer, author and American commentator, told CNN. "The baby that she came out for the first time, George, will be king." So, in a sense, she had a duty to go out and show us, here it is, it's the next king to the end of the century. "
Calls of duty
Of course, Kate was not the first royal mother to appear on the steps of St. Mary with babies-in-arms. Queen's second granddaughter, Zara Tindall, was the first newborn to be photographed, with her mother, Princess Anne, in 1981.
Princess Diana then appeared with Prince William outside the hospital in 1982.
Dickie Arbiter, spokesperson for the princess at the time, told CNN that there was no doubt that Diana would present her baby to the media after she was born.
"She was aware of what the royal family is, what certain traditions are attached to and what is expected of them," Arbiter said. "What is expected at the end of the day is all about homework.
"And if you give birth to the second line of the throne, then yes, it's your job to show it and show it, what she did." And she did the same with Harry two years later . "
When asked how hard it must have been physically for Diana, Arbiter replied, "Yes, it would have been painful, but she had a brave face and she smiled. She thought she was in front of the cameras, then she drove back to Kensington Palace, hard to do right after birth, but that's something she thought should be done, and it's done. "
Open the way?
Meghan, however, has none of it. In their statement of April 11, she and Harry stated that although they were "very grateful for the goodwill they received," they decided "to keep the plans around the arrival of their private baby ".
Greer thinks that by doing so, Meghan gives a positive example to other pregnant mothers. "Hopefully, women will not feel the pressure to give the impression that they are ready to make Vogue's cover after they give birth," Greer said. "And I think Meghan leads the way with that, which I think is great."
Perhaps Meghan follows the royal custom in his own way by deciding to keep birth out of public view.
Home births, which are by nature more private, were once the norm in the royal family. As Arbiter explains, "the four Queen's children were born at home – Charles at Clarence House (and) Anne, Andrew and Edward at Buckingham Palace." The two children of Princess Margaret are born at home " .
Seventh to the rank of the throne, Meghan and Harry's baby is far removed from the obligation to fulfill all the royal obligations imposed on the more direct heirs of the throne, such as their cousins, William's children. and Kate.
Greer thinks that by keeping the birth secret, Meghan could send the message worldwide that "his baby, even though he was born into a very public family – one of the most public in the world – It's not a public baby. This is our baby and we'll let you see it when we're ready to show you. "
Whenever Harry and Meghan decide to present the new royal arrival, the world will be ready and waiting.
Source link
